Five Big Ten impact newcomers for the 2017-18 season

  • 09/14/2017 9:08 am in

With a rearranged schedule and a wide open race behind consensus league favorite Michigan State, it should be a fascinating year in the Big Ten. The conference lost several key pieces to the NBA, including player of the year Caleb Swanigan. 

In no particular order, here’s a look at five newcomers we expect to make an impact next season in the Big Ten:

· Jaren Jackson, Michigan State: How loaded are the Spartans? Jackson is a top ten recruit nationally who is listed as a potential lottery pick in the 2018 NBA draft and it’s no guarantee that he’ll be a starter. At 6-foot-10 with the ability to play multiple positions, Jackson is a special talent with NBA bloodlines. His father, Jaren Jackson Sr., played at Georgetown and for several NBA teams.

Ideally, Michigan State will pair Jackson with Miles Bridges and Nick Ward in a loaded frontcourt. Given that Jackson and Bridges are capable of playing on the perimeter or in the paint, it should allow Tom Izzo to play them together frequently and exploit teams who attempt to play smaller lineups.

· Mark Alstork, Illinois: One of two graduate transfers on our list, Alstork arrives in Champaign from Wright State, where he averaged 19 points last season. A native of Dayton, Ohio, Alstork began his career at Ball State before transferring to Wright State.

Although the Illini are projected to finish in the bottom half of the Big Ten as they transition from John Groce to Brad Underwood, Alstork will have an opportunity to put up big numbers. The Illini graduated Malcolm Hill and Tracy Abrams and also lost Jalen Coleman-Lands. leaving Alstork as the clear cut first option offensively.

· Jaaron Simmons, Michigan: Despite losing Derrick Walton Jr. to graduation, there’s plenty of optimism surrounding the Wolverines this fall. And Simmons is a big part of it. The graduate transfer comes to Ann Arbor via Ohio University, where he averaged 15.9 points and 6.5 assists per game last season.

While his efficiency numbers weren’t great – a 22 percent turnover rate and an offensive rating of 99.7 – Simmons was brought in by John Beilein to play a major role in the ball screen offense. Given that Michigan lost 80 percent of its ball screen production from last season’s Sweet Sixteen team, Simmons should have every opportunity to play a major role.

· Thomas Allen, Nebraska: After a coaching change at North Carolina State last spring, Allen reopened the process and had no shortage of suitors. Kansas, Xavier and Creighton all made a run at Allen, but the high level shooter opted for Nebraska, where he’ll get a chance to play major minutes right away.

The Cornhuskers aren’t expected to contend in the Big Ten, but after finishing last season as one of the league’s worst shooting teams, they should get a major lift from Allen. Brewster Academy coach Jason Smith called Allen the “best pure shooter we’ve ever had.” For a school that has churned out over 100 Division I players, that’s high praise.

· Isaiah Washington, Minnesota: Nate Mason is Minnesota’s starting point guard and one of the league’s five best players. But the Gophers now have a capable backup and a guy who can also play alongside Mason in Washington. The 6-foot point guard, who starred at St. Raymonds in the Bronx, is a YouTube sensation.

Washington will give the Gophers, projected as a top four team in the conference entering the season, another capable lead guard in the rotation. He’ll also take some of the ball handling workload off of Mason, who averaged a team-high 34.5 minutes per game last season.

(Photo credit: Robin Alam/Icon Sportswire)

Filed to:

  • Outoftheloop

    I would trust both Rob (.864 FT) and DeRon (.809% FT).

  • Outoftheloop

    = 76

  • Ivan Renko

    i believe it was closer to around 80 last I checked, unsure though. but that’s my point regardless, that IU was consistently a top 10 or 15 scoring team in the ncaa under TC on a high powered offense (albeit dysfunctional to us fans) and lackluster defense. under Archie’s emphasized defense (and not really any lights-out scorers on this team), we are going to score fewer points overall, which isn’t bad because our opponents will be scoring less too

  • IdahoHoosier

    JBJ shot better on the season than Rob, Josh, and Devonte. Come on man, the stats are available. And you know comparing Devonte to JBJ is silly given that Devonte shot less than 30% the number of shots JBJ took. Not even sure what you are trying to argue at this point and the actual numbers aren’t supporting your claims anyway.

  • IdahoHoosier

    I appreciate your attempt at validating your projections but I’m still not drinking to Kool-aid. You are making some big leaps (exaggerations?) and your claims aren’t adding up. Bryant averaged more PPG in HS than Davis (and more rebounds, about the same on blocks). I appreciate your optimism and everything but I’d rather keep a realistic outlook. Anyway, eager for the season to start and see how it all comes together!

  • IdahoHoosier

    79.7 ppg last season according to bigten and espn. Where are you getting these numbers?

  • pdhoosier

    Well that pt prediction for starters is 58. So 4 more isn’t that far fetched. And loop’s last paragraph was as spot on as I can think. Archie’s offense, as you can see with his recruiting targets, is defense minded, but constant attack mode none the less. His past offenses were not great scorers, but he had less talent and relied more on the grind. He wouldn’t be recruiting top ten players if he didn’t want to win on both ends. And less turnovers and an overall more disciplined game will also aid that. If our defense is better than last year, I’d bet our offense is too. That core will still be itching to run and gun to some degree!

  • pdhoosier

    Install 2016 yogi to that team, no chance we don’t get it…!

  • ScoopGeoff

    There are lots of ways to be a stud without scoring… Juwan has been, IMO, an under-appreciated player, but he’s more the Swiss-Army-Stud than the scorer-stud… And it simply just isn’t that easy to amass points in college. The game is shorter and slower, there are more types of defenses allowed, the reffing is more inconsistent, and teammates are more inconsistent and less-experienced (compared to NBA where scoring is fairly easy).

  • bball at nick’s

    In his last year at Dayton Archie averaged 76 ppg.

  • Ivan Renko

    Dayton also wasn’t in the Big 10

  • bball at nick’s

    Uh sorry I forgot that Dayton is not a B1G team!!!! Points per game is not a function of strength of conference.

  • Ivan Renko

    I agree! But you had an ostensible overachiever coach in Archie in a weak conference with players he personally developed and grew within his system. I think there are going to be growing pains this first year, especially with so many seniors spending so many years under the TC system. I love IU basketball as much as the next guy on this site, but people seem to be projecting a 36-0 season next year with 90+ ppg like it’ll be business as usual. (I’m exaggerating to make a point)

  • Ivan Renko

    Yes, 58 is best case scenario if you take the maximum for each of my projections. Most likely will be low 50s though. Anyway, I’m more trying to point to the fact that the offense isn’t going to be a well oiled machine firing on all cylinders. Even coach K, Roy, and suckipari don’t have that every year. I think expectations should be tempered for Archie this year, there will be some solid growing pains IMO. Now 3 years from now when all his freshly recruited players are “firing on all cylinders” that’s when the BIG 10 and the rest of the nation is going to be scared to play IU