The Minute After: Wichita State

  • 03/20/2015 6:28 pm in

Thoughts on a 81-76 loss to the Shockers:

Indiana brought the proper fight, played its game and hung in the best it could. But Wichita State’s experience got the best of the Hoosiers down the stretch, and Indiana’s shot at the upset went with it.

After a Darius Carter free throw at the 10:24 mark in the second half put the Shockers up one (55-54), they never relinquished the lead. Yet, the Hoosiers made sure a blowout wasn’t on the way. Down eight and on the ropes with 7:53 to go, James Blackmon Jr. (14 points, five turnovers) made a lay-up. Two free throws from Yogi Ferrell and a Troy Williams 3-pointer pulled them back within three points (67-64).

And down seven with 3:51 to go, Collin Hartman — who made his first 3-pointer in a game since Feb. 15 and finished 3-of-4 from distance — and Ferrell hit back-to-back trey balls to pull the Hoosiers within one point (72-71) with 2:21 to go.

Despite getting within two points twice in the final two minutes — including two free throws from Ferrell that had them there with as little as 32 seconds to go — the Shockers just played a little smarter and hit from the line to ensure the five-point win for the opportunity to make it to Sunday’s round of 32 against Kansas.

With 53 seconds left and Wichita State up by two, a beautifully drawn up play out of a timeout saw a nice high-post assist from Carter to Tekele Cotton for a bucket. The Shockers hit 7-of-8 from the line over the final two minutes, while Indiana wasted 13 seconds during it after closing the gap at 32 seconds left, as they didn’t foul Ron Baker until 19 seconds left. Tom Crean screamed for the foul from the sidelines to no avail.

So down four after Baker hit both, Blackmon Jr. missed on the other end and then turned the ball over on his offensive rebound. That just about did it for the Hoosiers.

Indiana got into foul trouble in both the first and second half. Its frontcourt of Hartman, Emmitt Holt, Hanner Mosquera-Perea ended the game with 10 combined fouls. Hartman and Holt each had four. Blackmon Jr., Robert Johnson and Williams ended the contest with three a piece. The Shockers made them pay for it with a strong free throw rate (FTA/FGA) of 55.7 and an impressive 29-of-34 (85.3 percent) performance from the line. And while Indiana’s defense wasn’t as bad as we’d seen from them during the late-season slide, it had its holes.

On an afternoon Wichita State’s overall shooting wasn’t great (42.6 eFG%, just 2-of-13 from 3-point range) and leading scorer Ron Baker struggled from the field (3-of-13), the Shockers feasted on drives to the lane. They scored more than half their points (44) in the paint. Fred VanVleet torched the Hoosiers for 27 points thanks to a number of drives. He also hit 9-of-10 from the line.

The Shockers threw a press at the Hoosiers for good stretches of this game and it got their eyes big at times. When some more ball movement — or really any ball movement — might have been the better decision, Indiana saw lanes or minimal defense over the half court and just went for it. It sometimes resulted in a turnover. Couple that with some questionable passing at times in the half-court and Mosquera-Perea looking lost in the post and Indiana turned the ball over 18.8 percent of its possessions, which led to 18 points off turnovers for the Shockers. And while Indiana did a nice job on the offensive glass (33.3 OR%, 14 second-chance points), so did the Shockers (37.5 OR%, 14 second-chance points.)

Indiana shot it well from distance (11-of-22, 50 percent) and got a strong effort from Ferrell (24 points, 7-of-15 from the field).

But the better, more experienced team did all the little things sharper than the Hoosiers and it proved to be the difference. In an up and down year filled with plenty of off the court distractions, this team gave the proper energy and effort once the postseason hit.

Yet, it still lost five of its last six. Tom Crean’s Hoosiers have now failed to win a tournament game in two seasons. It’s not what Indiana fans expect, and so the outside noise is unlikely to cease.

Filed to:

  • IUMIKE1

    IUMIKE1 continues to click the upvote arrow for days on end ! lol

  • Jonny McClain

    wrong? I am questioning improvement defensively with regard to lateral quickness – how are you quantifying the improvement from year to year? can you improve defensively? sure but my point is to expect guys who are such bad defenders to make such a great jump in one offseason to contend for a final four may be unrealistic

  • Jonny McClain

    I believe he did guard vanvleet at times during the game – but regardless are you saying he can guard in the nba? where do you predict yogi to go in the draft? I still say the nba talk is absurd.

  • IUMIKE1

    I’ve coached more than a game or two, but never been a high level Div. 1 coach, but for what it’s worth here’s my opinion on the questions that you asked in order.
    No way our interior D should have been as poor as it was, cause it was bad, historically type bad, and in this fan’s opinion one of the main reasons was that Crean, for whatever reason, refused to ever play two bigs at the same time. I know the reasons that are given by the people that support this approach, but if you’re getting killed game in and game out is it not worth at least trying something else that could possibly address your most glaring deficiency on D ? He could have always switched back to his ” only one big at a time”, philosophy if it just did not work what so ever, but then again we’ll never know because he was too stubborn to even try it, and having two on the floor at the same time for only a couple or so minutes is by no means giving it a fair chance to succeed. A lot of people say we don’t know what goes on in practice and Crean does. While that is certainly true sometimes things clearly look one way in practice, but it turns out to be actually a whole lot different in actual game situations 🙁

    It sure seems to me that after playing 20 to 25 games the defense would have looked better, overall, after that many games.

    I think the players that could have provided more of a presence ( with maybe the exception of April) were actually the ones that got the vast majority of the minutes, but never were able to provide that presence so I guess the short answer to that one is, IMHO, no.

    I feel like EH was getting the amount of minutes that he deserved at the beginning of the season, but as the season wore on and he showed that he was improving and had something to offer the higher number of minutes, that were deserved, were not doled out to him.

  • Jonny McClain

    lots of options in the 2nd round, d-league or overseas…

  • calbert40

    That’s true, Mike. Good observation. Obviously, it is hard to compare the two programs, so it is hard to compare the coaches. Yes, IU can land better talent. That said, WSU lands good talent that stays for four years and learns to play together as a unit. I’ll take talent over a cohesive unit, but I think many of us who are fans of “blue blood” programs discount the value of four-year players. WSU is really good, because they a) have talent, but b) are a fine tuned, cohesive unit.

    If Crean was removed in the future, which I am neither advocating for or against with this comment, I would assume Marshall would be on the short list. He’s a good coach. It would be a significant jump in coaching profile in not only program prestige, but also in conference prestige and visibility. I think he’d be interested, if we were.

  • INUnivHoosier

    Like I said, “could be very expensive and not very fruitful.”