Big Ten power rankings: Week 3

  • 01/10/2011 3:46 pm in

The second installment of our Big Ten power rankings (we started after a week of games to get an early read on the league, so Week 3 = second installment). We’ve got movement at the top and bottom of the poll this week, with Illinois up to second and Indiana sliding to last.

Without further ado, and running from 11th to 1st this time ’round:

Inside the Hall Big Ten power rankings: Week 3

11. Indiana – NR; 9-8, 0-4; 33 total points

There are a myriad of problems with the Hoosiers right now, both tangible and intangible, and no one in the lineup seems immune. A fact perhaps most indicative of the Hoosiers’ problems is the simplest of all: They are 0-4 in the Big Ten, and have now lost six games in a row.

10. Iowa – NR; 7-8, 0-3; 30 total points

Another unanimous selection at their position in this week’s rankings, the Hawkeyes hold the dubious distinction of being the Big Ten’s only sub-.500 team overall. There could exist a chance to get a first Big Ten win for Fran McCaffrey at home Wednesday against Northwestern.

9. Michigan – NR; 11-5,  1-2; 25 total points

Oh but what could be for the Wolverines, who lost on Sunday by seven in overtime to No. 3 Kansas. Couple that with a three-point loss to Syracuse earlier in the season, and you get a picture of a team getting close. Yet the Wolverines are still being outscored by more than 10 points per game in Big Ten play, so maybe not as close as you’d think.

8. Penn State – NR; 9-6, 2-2; 24 total points

It’s getting harder to lend much weight to a win against Indiana, even at Assembly Hall. But the Nitts are 2-2 in the Big Ten, where frankly no one expected them to be at this time. Jeff Brooks’ 17.8 points per game in conference play have been immensely helpful.

7. Northwestern – NR; 10-4, 1-3; 22 total points

I know you probably heard it three dozen times last night from Shon Morris, but John Shurna broke out of his scoring slump in a big way against Indiana. What was just as important was how he did it — 6-of-9, hittig 8-of-10 free throws, after shooting a miserable 3-of-18 over his previous two games.

6. Minnesota – Receiving votes in AP/No. 25 Coaches; 12-4, 1-3; 19 total points

The brutal beginning to the Gophers’ Big Ten season, two match-ups with Top 25 teams on either side of a home date with Indiana, was supposed to give some idea of what Minnesota might bring this season. None of the three losses thus far has been a blowout, but three losses suggest that Tubby Smith’s crew might not be ready to play with the big boys. Beating Purdue on Thursday night could change that perception in a hurry.

5. Michigan State – Receiving votes in AP/No. 24 Coaches; 10-5, 2-1; 15 total points

The defense that the Spartans had no bad losses took a hit with a road defeat to Penn State last week. Three of Sparty’s next four (Wisconsin, Northwestern, at Illinois, at Purdue) are against ranked teams. It stands to reason that we ought to have a better idea of this team’s immediate future in 12 days’ time.

4. Wisconsin – No. 20 AP/No. 21 Coaches; 12-3, 2-1; 12 total points

There was a time when freshman Josh Gasser looked like a revelation for Bo Ryan and Wisconsin. That time has passed. Gasser has averaged just over two points per game in the Badgers’ last six, and has a grand total of four points scored in three Big Ten games thus far.

3. Purdue – Consensus No. 8; 15-1, 4-0; 8 total points

There’s an awful lot that’s good to say about the Boilers right now, unfortunately for Indiana fans. Purdue is averaging 80 points per game in conference play, with an average margin of victory in those games of 18.5 points. E’Twaun Moore became the program’s career leader in minutes played Sunday against Iowa, and junior guard Ryne Smith is averaging 17 points per contest in conference play.

2.  Illinois – Consensus No. 16; 13-3, 3-0; 7 total points

In a minor poll upset, Illinois slides ahead of Purdue for the No. 2 spot this week. The Illini have looked pretty impressive early in the Big Ten season. A Tuesday tilt with Penn State will give way to three consecutive games against top 10 opponents, culminating with a home test against No. 2 Ohio State on Jan. 22. We’ll learn of Illinois’ mettle quite soon, it would seem.

1. Ohio State – Consensus No. 2; 16-0, 3-0; 3 total points

As if there was any question. Ohio State takes unanimous No. 1 in the poll for the second straight week, and it’s about as hard to see them slipping from this spot any time soon as it is to see obvious weaknesses in the Buckeyes as a team. Columbus Dispatch writer Bob Baptist said this via Twitter of the Buckeyes: “Big Ten has exposed flaws. Work 2 do. But potential very high.” Sounds about right. The ceiling for this team is hard to spot right now.

Filed to:

  • Aceman_Mujezinovic_07

    Well, this is very depressing.

  • Hey I knew IU would rank at the top again just not as soon LOL – ok forget IU this year the real question is where would Ft Wayne Luers rank ?

  • Hey I knew IU would rank at the top again just not as soon LOL – ok forget IU this year the real question is where would Ft Wayne Luers rank ?

  • Anonymous

    Things I have grown weary of seeing:
    1. Poor coaching decisions in terms of the defense played; if Crean insists on playing zone, it’s time to teach the principles and objectives
    2. An incredible lack of movement on offense – this team has mastered four corners, it’s time to move on
    3. Watford shooting 3-pointers on a regular basis
    4. Verdell not playing with confidence, something for which Crean and staff must take responsibility
    5. Lack of playing time for Sheehey, who has become the Derek Elston of the 2010-11 season

    I have written off the rest of this season, and will eat my preseason 17-14 projection. This team will be fortunate to win two games in the Big Ten – a major backslide from a year ago.

    The two critical projects for this team right now are turning Watford into the post player he can be and the restoration of Mo Creek’s confidence. Jordy, Oladipo, Sheehey and Elston will keep playing hard – and their level of enthusiasm, commitment and execution will continue to improve going into 2011-12.

  • If there were 20 teams in the conference we’d be last at his point – but there is only one way to go – up…..still think we can get to 13 wins which would be an improvement from last year – but CTC and gang will have to get their (the players) mojo back…

    MSU, PU, OSU are at the top and IL and Whisky will round out the top 5. We have shot at the rest.

  • Aceman_Mujezinovic_07

    Not if SCSU, MSWU, and SUIE was in the conference with us! HA!

  • stonaroni

    I really thought this was going to be a better year and I hope and pray that what we are seeing are growing pains. Unfortunately, we are seeing poor perfrmances by the players and poor coaching.

    We fans want to win now as we should, I just don’t think we are going to have a legitimate chance as a title until 2013-14.

    At that point, our 4 upperclassmen will be Sheehey and VO as SR’s who will be great leaders. We will have Zeller and Etherington as JR’s who are great leaders.

    From there we will have SO’s Yogi starting at PG who is a great leader. A freak in HP, a 7′ C in Jurkin. A 6’3″ combo guard who can do a little of everything in Buss.

    Obviously there will be a plethera of talent in 2013 like Hartman and Davis.

    I really think CTC has to add a talented piece like Pitchford who is only getting better.

    In the meantime, IU will take a beating and hopefully CTC gets better at the X’s and O’s and game planning.

  • Anonymous

    I agree completely with this and it just is a strong indicator of how hard it is to build a team from scratch and turn a program around. It takes time, not just one Top 10 recruiting class. I just hope Perea stays around more than one year so he gets to that sophomore year.

  • Anonymous

    I agree with your assessment of the Northwestern game … my point relates to the entire year. Of the meaningful games:
    * Boston College – 12 minutes
    * Kentucky – 5 minutes
    * Northern Iowa – 5 minutes
    * Colorado – 10 minutes

    And it gets worse in the Big Ten:
    * Penn State – 1 minute (inexcusable, unless due to unknown injury or ailment)
    * Ohio State – 13 minutes (four fouls)
    * Minnesota – 8 minutes
    * Northwestern – 12 minutes (fouled out)

  • stonaroni

    If you look at a program like UC, much like IU, there cupboard was bare 5 years ago when Huggins left. 5 years later they are 15-1, without MAJOR talent. It took Cronin 5 years to get his system, style and players in place. Now UC should be a Top 25 program again.

    Give us 2 more years and we are legit and 3 more we should be a top 10 programs for years to come.

  • Anonymous

    UC’s cupboard was bare, but it wasn’t anywhere near as bare as IU, which will make the turnaround (which will come) that much more impressive. I just have to keep telling myself to have patience.