Comments on: Sagemont (FL) wing Will Sheehey to Indiana

By: The Kid

The Kid — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:07:11 +0000

I think that all of you should commit to stopping the use of the “word” “scholly.” Seriously, its a wee bit on the ridiculous side.

We need players (this was obviously Plan B) and this guy will contribute. Let's face it, we are shooting for the stars and getting the moon instead. IU will get there, but its a long way back to respectability. Saving the scholarship (see how easy that was) will not help score points.

By: cooper

cooper — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 05:42:07 +0000

Roth may as well pack his bags unless he wants to be the teams rich man's Finklemeier. With this guy in the mix Roth won't get any minutes next year ( I don't think he will get any this year either) He isn't athletic enough or strong enough to play at large D1 school. He surely isn't like the guy on UF from their championship teams(can't remember his name) that he was compared to by some

By: MillaRed

MillaRed — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:05:18 +0000

My thoughts are pretty positive guys. First of all, I think we are adding talent with Sheehey and that is never a bad idea. We're piling on with the guards but at some point a VERY solid 4 will emerge for regular duty. I think Olidapo brings similar athleticism yet maybe not the shooter Will is.

As far as Roth goes, let's give him more time. Worst case scenario, the guy gets his PT as a senior when it's all said and done. The major B10 programs always seem to have this junior or senior no one has ever heard of that ends up knocking down 4 three's in the big games. No one said EVRYONE has to be a contributor every year. So much can happen out there with injuries, transfers etc. Many Final Four teams have McDonald's All-American's on the bench!

The talent in our pool is thickening. One more top 50 and a few big men and we are getting there even quicker than I thought. Keep it up CTC!

By: Spencer_D

Spencer_D — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:11:14 +0000

Dislike.

By: Azur Allen

Azur Allen — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:06:25 +0000

just cuz roth won't see much of the floor doesn't mean there isn't a place for him on the team. yea he might transfer for more pt, but if little playing time is acceptable for him, then there's little more I'd love to see than him in those candy striped pants for the next few years. if he willingly accepts his role, he can be lethal

By: roninjeffersonville

roninjeffersonville — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:42:44 +0000

First let me say welcome Will Sheehey. I am looking forward to seeing you play
Second ( a lil off subject) Can someone please explain to me how this is going to work. After looking at the new updated scholarship numbers, with the signing of Sheehey and Oladipo. And the verbals from Carlino and Etherington. It looks to me we are full in the 2010 and 2011. I like this team (size speed and depth). But what about the Shelby's,Davis, Zeller, ok you get the point. Hate to see anyone transfer or leave

By: HoosierCrabbe

HoosierCrabbe — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:39:06 +0000

So now if we sign Selby, does this mean we can say goodbye to Matt Roth???

By: iudrew22

iudrew22 — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 02:38:18 +0000

I agree that he has a spot on this team…I am just wondering down the road where he will fit in…the hornsby reference may be where it is…but I just don't see the confidence in Roth that those great shooters have…he seems timid with the ball at times

By: Diesel

Diesel — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 01:55:13 +0000

To say that Roth is kind of like Hornsby and a little less rounded doesn't need refuted. The fact that both players are/were one-dimensional offensively is enough to compare them and Ben left enough wiggle room to say they were different. I'd like to think there is always room for a shooter on any team, but we'll see how Matt does this season.

By: JerryCT

JerryCT — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:25:04 +0000

I hope WS is a our JJ Reddick or another R Wittman.

As for Roth I was not high on him from HS compared to VJ3. But this year he has not been a liability at all on the floor and in fact he is getting pts inside the 3 line as well as playing D. I agree that we need to see how the season works out

By: GFDave

GFDave — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:24:35 +0000

Yeah, I saw that too. Northwestern is hoping for their first NCAA bid and now their best player is gone. Sucks for them, but it may help us notch a couple more Ws and get into the NIT.

By: Spencer_D

Spencer_D — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:18:56 +0000

Bingo. I definitely agree. VO and Sheehey certainly aren't 5 star talent, but they'll definitely be SOLID 4 year players at Indiana University. They'll add to the level at competition at practice, they'll heighten our teams' athleticism, and they add new pieces to our growing puzzle. In the long run, these kids will be better for the IU program than a 5 star player who will swoop in, demand immediate playing time, take away playing time from others who desperately need the experience, and then bail on the university when their time is up.

This 2010 class definitely doesn't have the glitz and glamor, but in the long run I think it'll be better for Indiana basketball.

GO IU!

By: Kelin Blab

Kelin Blab — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:15:12 +0000

Wow did anyone hear that Coble of NW is done for the season, and may red shirt…he is one of the few kids who has that old school flavor I enjoy watching play..even against IU.

By: ace132

ace132 — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:25:03 +0000

comparing roth to hornsby is a stretch. hornsby had a 35+ inch vert, i dont see roth anywhere near that number. also hornsby wasnt a liability on D, roth's quickness, or lack there of, is not well suited for our less than imposing frontcourt for when he gets blown by.

By: CreamandCrimson

CreamandCrimson — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:22:27 +0000

Welcome Will. Look at this way: He is a big upgrade over David Williams and he has a lot of potential. Sheehey and Oladipo immediately raise the athleticism.

By: BGleas

BGleas — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:03:57 +0000

The problem for Roth is if a few of these supremely athletic players are also reliable 3-pt shooters at the same time. You'll always go with the athletic shooter over the unathletic one. They're obviously not the exact same type of player, but if Sheehey, Ethrington, Carlino and Creek can all shoot well from beyond the arc, why would you put Roth in the game? Unless it's a end of half or game situation.

By: BGleas

BGleas — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:59:41 +0000

Definitely agree with you there. Would love to see Roth come into some games this year and absolutely catch fire.

By: Spencer_D

Spencer_D — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:35:04 +0000

Welcome to IU, Will.

By: GFDave

GFDave — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:33:38 +0000

I can't disagree. I just want the season to unfold and have more to go on before I decide.

By: plane1972

plane1972 — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:22:06 +0000

I don't see any comparison between the two. Completely different players, skill sets. All due respect to both players, but Sheehey is not going to hang out on the 3-point line to specialize in draining from deep and Roth is not going to run the court and play above the rim like Sheehey does. I fail to see the resemblance. I do agree that the continued addition of more athletic players will continue to put the squeeze on minutes for Roth, but that has been in the cards for awhile, now.