<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michigan State does the Big Ten proud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidethehall.com/2009/03/29/michigan-state-does-the-big-ten-proud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2009/03/29/michigan-state-does-the-big-ten-proud/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:30:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TomCoverdale&#39;s Eyebrows</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2009/03/29/michigan-state-does-the-big-ten-proud/comment-page-1/#comment-40543</link>
		<dc:creator>TomCoverdale&#39;s Eyebrows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=2630#comment-40543</guid>
		<description>I was happy to see Izzo and co win, despite having my bracket take another beating. Now that Billy Packer has quit, is it time to start annointing Digger Phelps as college basketball&#039;s most obnoxious/deafening talking head? I say yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was happy to see Izzo and co win, despite having my bracket take another beating. Now that Billy Packer has quit, is it time to start annointing Digger Phelps as college basketball&#39;s most obnoxious/deafening talking head? I say yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aerialM</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2009/03/29/michigan-state-does-the-big-ten-proud/comment-page-1/#comment-40542</link>
		<dc:creator>aerialM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=2630#comment-40542</guid>
		<description>actually, i don&#039;t agree that &quot;everyone else sucked&quot; save for purdue - the b10 gets credit by getting in the # of teams we got in with our champ getting to the final 4. and really, purdue and msu did well but consider that wisconsin &amp; michigan both beat upper-mid tier acc teams. sure minn &amp; illinois &amp; oh st got beat in the 1st round, but they were supposed to be a year away anyway, so in a sense each one of the teams besides purdue and msu overachieved this year. so to say we sucked as a conference isn&#039;t correct. are we as deep &amp; good as the big east? no. the acc? no. but are we above the sec? yes. the pac-10? the big 12? the # of seeds say yes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, i don&#39;t agree that &#8220;everyone else sucked&#8221; save for purdue &#8211; the b10 gets credit by getting in the # of teams we got in with our champ getting to the final 4. and really, purdue and msu did well but consider that wisconsin &#038; michigan both beat upper-mid tier acc teams. sure minn &#038; illinois &#038; oh st got beat in the 1st round, but they were supposed to be a year away anyway, so in a sense each one of the teams besides purdue and msu overachieved this year. so to say we sucked as a conference isn&#39;t correct. are we as deep &#038; good as the big east? no. the acc? no. but are we above the sec? yes. the pac-10? the big 12? the # of seeds say yes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomCoverdale&#39;s Eyebrows</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2009/03/29/michigan-state-does-the-big-ten-proud/comment-page-1/#comment-24436</link>
		<dc:creator>TomCoverdale&#39;s Eyebrows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=2630#comment-24436</guid>
		<description>I was happy to see Izzo and co win, despite having my bracket take another beating. Now that Billy Packer has quit, is it time to start annointing Digger Phelps as college basketball&#039;s most obnoxious/deafening talking head? I say yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was happy to see Izzo and co win, despite having my bracket take another beating. Now that Billy Packer has quit, is it time to start annointing Digger Phelps as college basketball&#39;s most obnoxious/deafening talking head? I say yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomCoverdale&#39;s Eyebrows</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2009/03/29/michigan-state-does-the-big-ten-proud/comment-page-1/#comment-25568</link>
		<dc:creator>TomCoverdale&#39;s Eyebrows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=2630#comment-25568</guid>
		<description>I was happy to see Izzo and co win, despite having my bracket take another beating. Now that Billy Packer has quit, is it time to start annointing Digger Phelps as college basketball&#039;s most obnoxious/deafening talking head? I say yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was happy to see Izzo and co win, despite having my bracket take another beating. Now that Billy Packer has quit, is it time to start annointing Digger Phelps as college basketball&#39;s most obnoxious/deafening talking head? I say yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aerialM</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2009/03/29/michigan-state-does-the-big-ten-proud/comment-page-1/#comment-24434</link>
		<dc:creator>aerialM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 05:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=2630#comment-24434</guid>
		<description>actually, i don&#039;t agree that &quot;everyone else sucked&quot; save for purdue - the b10 gets credit by getting in the # of teams we got in with our champ getting to the final 4. and really, purdue and msu did well but consider that wisconsin &amp; michigan both beat upper-mid tier acc teams. sure minn &amp; illinois &amp; oh st got beat in the 1st round, but they were supposed to be a year away anyway, so in a sense each one of the teams besides purdue and msu overachieved this year. so to say we sucked as a conference isn&#039;t correct. are we as deep &amp; good as the big east? no. the acc? no. but are we above the sec? yes. the pac-10? the big 12? the # of seeds say yes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, i don&#39;t agree that &#8220;everyone else sucked&#8221; save for purdue &#8211; the b10 gets credit by getting in the # of teams we got in with our champ getting to the final 4. and really, purdue and msu did well but consider that wisconsin &#038; michigan both beat upper-mid tier acc teams. sure minn &#038; illinois &#038; oh st got beat in the 1st round, but they were supposed to be a year away anyway, so in a sense each one of the teams besides purdue and msu overachieved this year. so to say we sucked as a conference isn&#39;t correct. are we as deep &#038; good as the big east? no. the acc? no. but are we above the sec? yes. the pac-10? the big 12? the # of seeds say yes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aerialM</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2009/03/29/michigan-state-does-the-big-ten-proud/comment-page-1/#comment-25565</link>
		<dc:creator>aerialM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 05:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=2630#comment-25565</guid>
		<description>actually, i don&#039;t agree that &quot;everyone else sucked&quot; save for purdue - the b10 gets credit by getting in the # of teams we got in with our champ getting to the final 4. and really, purdue and msu did well but consider that wisconsin &amp; michigan both beat upper-mid tier acc teams. sure minn &amp; illinois &amp; oh st got beat in the 1st round, but they were supposed to be a year away anyway, so in a sense each one of the teams besides purdue and msu overachieved this year. so to say we sucked as a conference isn&#039;t correct. are we as deep &amp; good as the big east? no. the acc? no. but are we above the sec? yes. the pac-10? the big 12? the # of seeds say yes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually, i don&#39;t agree that &#8220;everyone else sucked&#8221; save for purdue &#8211; the b10 gets credit by getting in the # of teams we got in with our champ getting to the final 4. and really, purdue and msu did well but consider that wisconsin &#038; michigan both beat upper-mid tier acc teams. sure minn &#038; illinois &#038; oh st got beat in the 1st round, but they were supposed to be a year away anyway, so in a sense each one of the teams besides purdue and msu overachieved this year. so to say we sucked as a conference isn&#39;t correct. are we as deep &#038; good as the big east? no. the acc? no. but are we above the sec? yes. the pac-10? the big 12? the # of seeds say yes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peabody Tizzlecut</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2009/03/29/michigan-state-does-the-big-ten-proud/comment-page-1/#comment-24433</link>
		<dc:creator>Peabody Tizzlecut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=2630#comment-24433</guid>
		<description>We arent going to get any credit as a league. We have 1 team in the final 8. Our leagues best coach made it to the final 4. How does the conference get credit? Everyone else sucked in the tourney except for Purdue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We arent going to get any credit as a league. We have 1 team in the final 8. Our leagues best coach made it to the final 4. How does the conference get credit? Everyone else sucked in the tourney except for Purdue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peabody Tizzlecut</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2009/03/29/michigan-state-does-the-big-ten-proud/comment-page-1/#comment-25562</link>
		<dc:creator>Peabody Tizzlecut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=2630#comment-25562</guid>
		<description>We arent going to get any credit as a league. We have 1 team in the final 8. Our leagues best coach made it to the final 4. How does the conference get credit? Everyone else sucked in the tourney except for Purdue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We arent going to get any credit as a league. We have 1 team in the final 8. Our leagues best coach made it to the final 4. How does the conference get credit? Everyone else sucked in the tourney except for Purdue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peabody Tizzlecut</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2009/03/29/michigan-state-does-the-big-ten-proud/comment-page-1/#comment-24432</link>
		<dc:creator>Peabody Tizzlecut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=2630#comment-24432</guid>
		<description>Not shocking, we tried hard all year. UL gave up. I was there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not shocking, we tried hard all year. UL gave up. I was there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peabody Tizzlecut</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2009/03/29/michigan-state-does-the-big-ten-proud/comment-page-1/#comment-25546</link>
		<dc:creator>Peabody Tizzlecut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=2630#comment-25546</guid>
		<description>Not shocking, we tried hard all year. UL gave up. I was there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not shocking, we tried hard all year. UL gave up. I was there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
