<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A first look: 2010 recruiting class</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BGleas</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-38448</link>
		<dc:creator>BGleas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 21:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-38448</guid>
		<description>Ok, dude...I guess winning is of no importance to you. Hey, i have an idea dude, how about we just make the basketball team a club sport instead of varsity? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we want to return to the prestige that IU basketball has had in the past, including Big Ten titles and National Championships then you need NBA quality players consistently coming into your program, especially big men.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t know why there is this misconception that winning in college basketball today and recruiting top high school players means selling youself to the devil and recruiting drug adicts that can read. Look at UNC, Duke, UCLA and Kansas. All very successful program over the last decade and longer and for the most part all those program are clean and have recruited respected citizens and students.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why wouldn&#039;t you want winning players like Hansbrough, Russell Westbrook, Brandon Rush and Kyle Singler? All were top recruits that will play or are playing in the NBA, and all were model citizens and winners in college. What is so bad about that dude?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, dude&#8230;I guess winning is of no importance to you. Hey, i have an idea dude, how about we just make the basketball team a club sport instead of varsity? </p>
<p>If we want to return to the prestige that IU basketball has had in the past, including Big Ten titles and National Championships then you need NBA quality players consistently coming into your program, especially big men.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t know why there is this misconception that winning in college basketball today and recruiting top high school players means selling youself to the devil and recruiting drug adicts that can read. Look at UNC, Duke, UCLA and Kansas. All very successful program over the last decade and longer and for the most part all those program are clean and have recruited respected citizens and students.</p>
<p>Why wouldn&#39;t you want winning players like Hansbrough, Russell Westbrook, Brandon Rush and Kyle Singler? All were top recruits that will play or are playing in the NBA, and all were model citizens and winners in college. What is so bad about that dude?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BGleas</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-21524</link>
		<dc:creator>BGleas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-21524</guid>
		<description>Ok, dude...I guess winning is of no importance to you. Hey, i have an idea dude, how about we just make the basketball team a club sport instead of varsity? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we want to return to the prestige that IU basketball has had in the past, including Big Ten titles and National Championships then you need NBA quality players consistently coming into your program, especially big men.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t know why there is this misconception that winning in college basketball today and recruiting top high school players means selling youself to the devil and recruiting drug adicts that can read. Look at UNC, Duke, UCLA and Kansas. All very successful program over the last decade and for the most part all those program are clean and have recruited respected citizens and students.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why wouldn&#039;t you want winning players like Hansbrough, Russell Westbrook, Brandon Rush and Kyle Singler? All were top recruits that will play or are playing in the NBA, and all were model citizens and winners in college. What is so bad about that dude?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, dude&#8230;I guess winning is of no importance to you. Hey, i have an idea dude, how about we just make the basketball team a club sport instead of varsity? </p>
<p>If we want to return to the prestige that IU basketball has had in the past, including Big Ten titles and National Championships then you need NBA quality players consistently coming into your program, especially big men.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t know why there is this misconception that winning in college basketball today and recruiting top high school players means selling youself to the devil and recruiting drug adicts that can read. Look at UNC, Duke, UCLA and Kansas. All very successful program over the last decade and for the most part all those program are clean and have recruited respected citizens and students.</p>
<p>Why wouldn&#39;t you want winning players like Hansbrough, Russell Westbrook, Brandon Rush and Kyle Singler? All were top recruits that will play or are playing in the NBA, and all were model citizens and winners in college. What is so bad about that dude?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BGleas</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-21569</link>
		<dc:creator>BGleas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-21569</guid>
		<description>Ok, dude...I guess winning is of no importance to you. Hey, i have an idea dude, how about we just make the basketball team a club sport instead of varsity? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we want to return to the prestige that IU basketball has had in the past, including Big Ten titles and National Championships then you need NBA quality players consistently coming into your program, especially big men.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t know why there is this misconception that winning in college basketball today and recruiting top high school players means selling youself to the devil and recruiting drug adicts that can read. Look at UNC, Duke, UCLA and Kansas. All very successful program over the last decade and longer and for the most part all those program are clean and have recruited respected citizens and students.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why wouldn&#039;t you want winning players like Hansbrough, Russell Westbrook, Brandon Rush and Kyle Singler? All were top recruits that will play or are playing in the NBA, and all were model citizens and winners in college. What is so bad about that dude?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, dude&#8230;I guess winning is of no importance to you. Hey, i have an idea dude, how about we just make the basketball team a club sport instead of varsity? </p>
<p>If we want to return to the prestige that IU basketball has had in the past, including Big Ten titles and National Championships then you need NBA quality players consistently coming into your program, especially big men.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t know why there is this misconception that winning in college basketball today and recruiting top high school players means selling youself to the devil and recruiting drug adicts that can read. Look at UNC, Duke, UCLA and Kansas. All very successful program over the last decade and longer and for the most part all those program are clean and have recruited respected citizens and students.</p>
<p>Why wouldn&#39;t you want winning players like Hansbrough, Russell Westbrook, Brandon Rush and Kyle Singler? All were top recruits that will play or are playing in the NBA, and all were model citizens and winners in college. What is so bad about that dude?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BGleas</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-21733</link>
		<dc:creator>BGleas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-21733</guid>
		<description>Ok, dude...I guess winning is of no importance to you. Hey, i have an idea dude, how about we just make the basketball team a club sport instead of varsity? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we want to return to the prestige that IU basketball has had in the past, including Big Ten titles and National Championships then you need NBA quality players consistently coming into your program, especially big men.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t know why there is this misconception that winning in college basketball today and recruiting top high school players means selling youself to the devil and recruiting drug adicts that can read. Look at UNC, Duke, UCLA and Kansas. All very successful program over the last decade and longer and for the most part all those program are clean and have recruited respected citizens and students.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why wouldn&#039;t you want winning players like Hansbrough, Russell Westbrook, Brandon Rush and Kyle Singler? All were top recruits that will play or are playing in the NBA, and all were model citizens and winners in college. What is so bad about that dude?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, dude&#8230;I guess winning is of no importance to you. Hey, i have an idea dude, how about we just make the basketball team a club sport instead of varsity? </p>
<p>If we want to return to the prestige that IU basketball has had in the past, including Big Ten titles and National Championships then you need NBA quality players consistently coming into your program, especially big men.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t know why there is this misconception that winning in college basketball today and recruiting top high school players means selling youself to the devil and recruiting drug adicts that can read. Look at UNC, Duke, UCLA and Kansas. All very successful program over the last decade and longer and for the most part all those program are clean and have recruited respected citizens and students.</p>
<p>Why wouldn&#39;t you want winning players like Hansbrough, Russell Westbrook, Brandon Rush and Kyle Singler? All were top recruits that will play or are playing in the NBA, and all were model citizens and winners in college. What is so bad about that dude?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BGleas</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-22117</link>
		<dc:creator>BGleas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-22117</guid>
		<description>Ok, dude...I guess winning is of no importance to you. Hey, i have an idea dude, how about we just make the basketball team a club sport instead of varsity? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we want to return to the prestige that IU basketball has had in the past, including Big Ten titles and National Championships then you need NBA quality players consistently coming into your program, especially big men.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t know why there is this misconception that winning in college basketball today and recruiting top high school players means selling youself to the devil and recruiting drug adicts that can read. Look at UNC, Duke, UCLA and Kansas. All very successful program over the last decade and longer and for the most part all those program are clean and have recruited respected citizens and students.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why wouldn&#039;t you want winning players like Hansbrough, Russell Westbrook, Brandon Rush and Kyle Singler? All were top recruits that will play or are playing in the NBA, and all were model citizens and winners in college. What is so bad about that dude?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, dude&#8230;I guess winning is of no importance to you. Hey, i have an idea dude, how about we just make the basketball team a club sport instead of varsity? </p>
<p>If we want to return to the prestige that IU basketball has had in the past, including Big Ten titles and National Championships then you need NBA quality players consistently coming into your program, especially big men.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t know why there is this misconception that winning in college basketball today and recruiting top high school players means selling youself to the devil and recruiting drug adicts that can read. Look at UNC, Duke, UCLA and Kansas. All very successful program over the last decade and longer and for the most part all those program are clean and have recruited respected citizens and students.</p>
<p>Why wouldn&#39;t you want winning players like Hansbrough, Russell Westbrook, Brandon Rush and Kyle Singler? All were top recruits that will play or are playing in the NBA, and all were model citizens and winners in college. What is so bad about that dude?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BGleas</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-29459</link>
		<dc:creator>BGleas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-29459</guid>
		<description>Ok, dude...I guess winning is of no importance to you. Hey, i have an idea dude, how about we just make the basketball team a club sport instead of varsity? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we want to return to the prestige that IU basketball has had in the past, including Big Ten titles and National Championships then you need NBA quality players consistently coming into your program, especially big men.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t know why there is this misconception that winning in college basketball today and recruiting top high school players means selling youself to the devil and recruiting drug adicts that can read. Look at UNC, Duke, UCLA and Kansas. All very successful program over the last decade and longer and for the most part all those program are clean and have recruited respected citizens and students.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why wouldn&#039;t you want winning players like Hansbrough, Russell Westbrook, Brandon Rush and Kyle Singler? All were top recruits that will play or are playing in the NBA, and all were model citizens and winners in college. What is so bad about that dude?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, dude&#8230;I guess winning is of no importance to you. Hey, i have an idea dude, how about we just make the basketball team a club sport instead of varsity? </p>
<p>If we want to return to the prestige that IU basketball has had in the past, including Big Ten titles and National Championships then you need NBA quality players consistently coming into your program, especially big men.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t know why there is this misconception that winning in college basketball today and recruiting top high school players means selling youself to the devil and recruiting drug adicts that can read. Look at UNC, Duke, UCLA and Kansas. All very successful program over the last decade and longer and for the most part all those program are clean and have recruited respected citizens and students.</p>
<p>Why wouldn&#39;t you want winning players like Hansbrough, Russell Westbrook, Brandon Rush and Kyle Singler? All were top recruits that will play or are playing in the NBA, and all were model citizens and winners in college. What is so bad about that dude?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BGleas</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-32797</link>
		<dc:creator>BGleas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-32797</guid>
		<description>Ok, dude...I guess winning is of no importance to you. Hey, i have an idea dude, how about we just make the basketball team a club sport instead of varsity? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If we want to return to the prestige that IU basketball has had in the past, including Big Ten titles and National Championships then you need NBA quality players consistently coming into your program, especially big men.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t know why there is this misconception that winning in college basketball today and recruiting top high school players means selling youself to the devil and recruiting drug adicts that can read. Look at UNC, Duke, UCLA and Kansas. All very successful program over the last decade and longer and for the most part all those program are clean and have recruited respected citizens and students.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why wouldn&#039;t you want winning players like Hansbrough, Russell Westbrook, Brandon Rush and Kyle Singler? All were top recruits that will play or are playing in the NBA, and all were model citizens and winners in college. What is so bad about that dude?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, dude&#8230;I guess winning is of no importance to you. Hey, i have an idea dude, how about we just make the basketball team a club sport instead of varsity? </p>
<p>If we want to return to the prestige that IU basketball has had in the past, including Big Ten titles and National Championships then you need NBA quality players consistently coming into your program, especially big men.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t know why there is this misconception that winning in college basketball today and recruiting top high school players means selling youself to the devil and recruiting drug adicts that can read. Look at UNC, Duke, UCLA and Kansas. All very successful program over the last decade and longer and for the most part all those program are clean and have recruited respected citizens and students.</p>
<p>Why wouldn&#39;t you want winning players like Hansbrough, Russell Westbrook, Brandon Rush and Kyle Singler? All were top recruits that will play or are playing in the NBA, and all were model citizens and winners in college. What is so bad about that dude?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-21522</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-21522</guid>
		<description>We are not looking for NBA players dude...we are looking for guys that will graduate and are team players so i dont know what you are talking about</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are not looking for NBA players dude&#8230;we are looking for guys that will graduate and are team players so i dont know what you are talking about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-21568</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-21568</guid>
		<description>We are not looking for NBA players dude...we are looking for guys that will graduate and are team players so i dont know what you are talking about</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are not looking for NBA players dude&#8230;we are looking for guys that will graduate and are team players so i dont know what you are talking about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-21732</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-21732</guid>
		<description>We are not looking for NBA players dude...we are looking for guys that will graduate and are team players so i dont know what you are talking about</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are not looking for NBA players dude&#8230;we are looking for guys that will graduate and are team players so i dont know what you are talking about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-22116</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-22116</guid>
		<description>We are not looking for NBA players dude...we are looking for guys that will graduate and are team players so i dont know what you are talking about</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are not looking for NBA players dude&#8230;we are looking for guys that will graduate and are team players so i dont know what you are talking about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-29458</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-29458</guid>
		<description>We are not looking for NBA players dude...we are looking for guys that will graduate and are team players so i dont know what you are talking about</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are not looking for NBA players dude&#8230;we are looking for guys that will graduate and are team players so i dont know what you are talking about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-32795</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-32795</guid>
		<description>We are not looking for NBA players dude...we are looking for guys that will graduate and are team players so i dont know what you are talking about</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are not looking for NBA players dude&#8230;we are looking for guys that will graduate and are team players so i dont know what you are talking about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-44190</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-44190</guid>
		<description>The team will be taller next year, and certainly much improved.  I just remember how last year&#039;s team struggled against taller teams.  Granted, UConn is a bit of a freak show as far as height is concerned, but we lost handily to Arkansas.  Even if you excuse that loss to the Kelvin Sampson fiasco, we also couldn&#039;t close the deal against Wisconsin, and struggled more than we probably should have against Illinois and Ohio State, who were among the top 20 teams in effective height (for those of you that read Ken Pomeroy&#039;s site) last year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All I&#039;m really trying to say I&#039;d prefer to not see guards for the sake of guards in the 2010 class.  If they aren&#039;t blue chip recruits, or if Crean isn&#039;t convinced he&#039;s found the next Dwayne Wade (who was on no one&#039;s recruiting lists), I&#039;d prefer him to take a pass rather than filling a spot.  Of course, I don&#039;t just want the tallest guy available either.  Others have posted that they&#039;d prefer to pass 2010 in order to land more top recruits in 2011.  I think I might be in that camp as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The team will be taller next year, and certainly much improved.  I just remember how last year&#39;s team struggled against taller teams.  Granted, UConn is a bit of a freak show as far as height is concerned, but we lost handily to Arkansas.  Even if you excuse that loss to the Kelvin Sampson fiasco, we also couldn&#39;t close the deal against Wisconsin, and struggled more than we probably should have against Illinois and Ohio State, who were among the top 20 teams in effective height (for those of you that read Ken Pomeroy&#39;s site) last year.</p>
<p>All I&#39;m really trying to say I&#39;d prefer to not see guards for the sake of guards in the 2010 class.  If they aren&#39;t blue chip recruits, or if Crean isn&#39;t convinced he&#39;s found the next Dwayne Wade (who was on no one&#39;s recruiting lists), I&#39;d prefer him to take a pass rather than filling a spot.  Of course, I don&#39;t just want the tallest guy available either.  Others have posted that they&#39;d prefer to pass 2010 in order to land more top recruits in 2011.  I think I might be in that camp as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BGleas</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-21436</link>
		<dc:creator>BGleas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-21436</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t speaking specifically about 2010. Just in general that you almost always need at least one NBA caliber big man, a few other solid ones, to win the title. Other than DJ White Indiana hasn&#039;t had a big man headline a recruiting class in a long time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Syracuse had Warrick, Maryland had Baxter (All-American) and Wilcox (lottery pick). MSU is the last team to not have that. You&#039;re also right about Arizona, but that&#039;s twice in the last 11 years. Even most of the runner&#039;s up had NBA quality bigs. The myth that college basketball is a guards game is exactly that, a myth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#39;t speaking specifically about 2010. Just in general that you almost always need at least one NBA caliber big man, a few other solid ones, to win the title. Other than DJ White Indiana hasn&#39;t had a big man headline a recruiting class in a long time.</p>
<p>Syracuse had Warrick, Maryland had Baxter (All-American) and Wilcox (lottery pick). MSU is the last team to not have that. You&#39;re also right about Arizona, but that&#39;s twice in the last 11 years. Even most of the runner&#39;s up had NBA quality bigs. The myth that college basketball is a guards game is exactly that, a myth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BGleas</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-21567</link>
		<dc:creator>BGleas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-21567</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t speaking specifically about 2010. Just in general that you almost always need at least one NBA caliber big man, a few other solid ones, to win the title. Other than DJ White Indiana hasn&#039;t had a big man headline a recruiting class in a long time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Syracuse had Warrick, Maryland had Baxter (All-American) and Wilcox (lottery pick). MSU is the last team to not have that. You&#039;re also right about Arizona, but that&#039;s twice in the last 11 years. Even most of the runner&#039;s up had NBA quality bigs. The myth that college basketball is a guards game is exactly that, a myth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#39;t speaking specifically about 2010. Just in general that you almost always need at least one NBA caliber big man, a few other solid ones, to win the title. Other than DJ White Indiana hasn&#39;t had a big man headline a recruiting class in a long time.</p>
<p>Syracuse had Warrick, Maryland had Baxter (All-American) and Wilcox (lottery pick). MSU is the last team to not have that. You&#39;re also right about Arizona, but that&#39;s twice in the last 11 years. Even most of the runner&#39;s up had NBA quality bigs. The myth that college basketball is a guards game is exactly that, a myth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BGleas</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-21731</link>
		<dc:creator>BGleas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-21731</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t speaking specifically about 2010. Just in general that you almost always need at least one NBA caliber big man, a few other solid ones, to win the title. Other than DJ White Indiana hasn&#039;t had a big man headline a recruiting class in a long time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Syracuse had Warrick, Maryland had Baxter (All-American) and Wilcox (lottery pick). MSU is the last team to not have that. You&#039;re also right about Arizona, but that&#039;s twice in the last 11 years. Even most of the runner&#039;s up had NBA quality bigs. The myth that college basketball is a guards game is exactly that, a myth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#39;t speaking specifically about 2010. Just in general that you almost always need at least one NBA caliber big man, a few other solid ones, to win the title. Other than DJ White Indiana hasn&#39;t had a big man headline a recruiting class in a long time.</p>
<p>Syracuse had Warrick, Maryland had Baxter (All-American) and Wilcox (lottery pick). MSU is the last team to not have that. You&#39;re also right about Arizona, but that&#39;s twice in the last 11 years. Even most of the runner&#39;s up had NBA quality bigs. The myth that college basketball is a guards game is exactly that, a myth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BGleas</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-22115</link>
		<dc:creator>BGleas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-22115</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t speaking specifically about 2010. Just in general that you almost always need at least one NBA caliber big man, a few other solid ones, to win the title. Other than DJ White Indiana hasn&#039;t had a big man headline a recruiting class in a long time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Syracuse had Warrick, Maryland had Baxter (All-American) and Wilcox (lottery pick). MSU is the last team to not have that. You&#039;re also right about Arizona, but that&#039;s twice in the last 11 years. Even most of the runner&#039;s up had NBA quality bigs. The myth that college basketball is a guards game is exactly that, a myth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#39;t speaking specifically about 2010. Just in general that you almost always need at least one NBA caliber big man, a few other solid ones, to win the title. Other than DJ White Indiana hasn&#39;t had a big man headline a recruiting class in a long time.</p>
<p>Syracuse had Warrick, Maryland had Baxter (All-American) and Wilcox (lottery pick). MSU is the last team to not have that. You&#39;re also right about Arizona, but that&#39;s twice in the last 11 years. Even most of the runner&#39;s up had NBA quality bigs. The myth that college basketball is a guards game is exactly that, a myth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BGleas</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-29457</link>
		<dc:creator>BGleas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-29457</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t speaking specifically about 2010. Just in general that you almost always need at least one NBA caliber big man, a few other solid ones, to win the title. Other than DJ White Indiana hasn&#039;t had a big man headline a recruiting class in a long time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Syracuse had Warrick, Maryland had Baxter (All-American) and Wilcox (lottery pick). MSU is the last team to not have that. You&#039;re also right about Arizona, but that&#039;s twice in the last 11 years. Even most of the runner&#039;s up had NBA quality bigs. The myth that college basketball is a guards game is exactly that, a myth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#39;t speaking specifically about 2010. Just in general that you almost always need at least one NBA caliber big man, a few other solid ones, to win the title. Other than DJ White Indiana hasn&#39;t had a big man headline a recruiting class in a long time.</p>
<p>Syracuse had Warrick, Maryland had Baxter (All-American) and Wilcox (lottery pick). MSU is the last team to not have that. You&#39;re also right about Arizona, but that&#39;s twice in the last 11 years. Even most of the runner&#39;s up had NBA quality bigs. The myth that college basketball is a guards game is exactly that, a myth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BGleas</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/12/16/a-first-look-2010-recruiting-class/comment-page-7/#comment-32792</link>
		<dc:creator>BGleas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/?p=1719#comment-32792</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t speaking specifically about 2010. Just in general that you almost always need at least one NBA caliber big man, a few other solid ones, to win the title. Other than DJ White Indiana hasn&#039;t had a big man headline a recruiting class in a long time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Syracuse had Warrick, Maryland had Baxter (All-American) and Wilcox (lottery pick). MSU is the last team to not have that. You&#039;re also right about Arizona, but that&#039;s twice in the last 11 years. Even most of the runner&#039;s up had NBA quality bigs. The myth that college basketball is a guards game is exactly that, a myth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#39;t speaking specifically about 2010. Just in general that you almost always need at least one NBA caliber big man, a few other solid ones, to win the title. Other than DJ White Indiana hasn&#39;t had a big man headline a recruiting class in a long time.</p>
<p>Syracuse had Warrick, Maryland had Baxter (All-American) and Wilcox (lottery pick). MSU is the last team to not have that. You&#39;re also right about Arizona, but that&#39;s twice in the last 11 years. Even most of the runner&#39;s up had NBA quality bigs. The myth that college basketball is a guards game is exactly that, a myth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 478/479 objects using apc

Served from: insidethehall.com @ 2012-02-09 22:01:15 -->
