Comments on: Weird: The NCAA gives IU nine more days to respond to allegations http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/ Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:44:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: tberry http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-39150 tberry Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:15:13 +0000 http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/#comment-39150 This tells me either:<br><br>1. The NCAA can't meet their own deadline...or<br><br>2. There is some new revelation or information they have received or found in the investigation notes that they are now wanting to consider so they can make a more accurate appraisal of IU's response when it is received.<br><br>They can judge the coaches and IU separately by simply deciding to look at only the information pertinent to current focus of deliberation and keep the rest, unviewed until required. This tells me either:

1. The NCAA can't meet their own deadline…or

2. There is some new revelation or information they have received or found in the investigation notes that they are now wanting to consider so they can make a more accurate appraisal of IU's response when it is received.

They can judge the coaches and IU separately by simply deciding to look at only the information pertinent to current focus of deliberation and keep the rest, unviewed until required.

]]> By: peaychris http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-39145 peaychris Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:44:17 +0000 http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/#comment-39145 sorry E i could not put it as eloquently as you with your Quis custodiet ipsos custodes statement... but i hate how Brand used IU to take the job at the NCAA.. but what hurts worse is how sampson screwed the IU fathful who valued playing by the rules for decades before that "ass-clown" (to quote from office space, not quite Juvenal!!) i guess you could call me a bitter betty.. i live in alabama now and i see the crime that is SEC football and i thought our program was a beacon of hope that what college sports were supposed to be... sorry E i could not put it as eloquently as you with your Quis custodiet ipsos custodes statement… but i hate how Brand used IU to take the job at the NCAA.. but what hurts worse is how sampson screwed the IU fathful who valued playing by the rules for decades before that “ass-clown” (to quote from office space, not quite Juvenal!!) i guess you could call me a bitter betty.. i live in alabama now and i see the crime that is SEC football and i thought our program was a beacon of hope that what college sports were supposed to be…

]]> By: JerryCT http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-39148 JerryCT Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:19:51 +0000 http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/#comment-39148 His claim already stated that "if he had been aware..." thus shifting blame to compliance.<br><br>Any coach, with any sense and will to comply and in their right mind, who had just been severely penalized ...........would have demanded to know day by day the status of calls and visits.<br><br>Did he not know when the phone was handed to him ? He needed compliance to tell him ?<br><br>In any event when I reviewed all the calls and you:<br>1. eliminate Morris twins ( NCAA counted as one player ) and Mackey<br>2. eliminate calls under 3minutes as NCAA usually does<br><br>You get about 30 violations not 130 almost all of which apply to Senderhoff His claim already stated that “if he had been aware…” thus shifting blame to compliance.

Any coach, with any sense and will to comply and in their right mind, who had just been severely penalized ………..would have demanded to know day by day the status of calls and visits.

Did he not know when the phone was handed to him ? He needed compliance to tell him ?

In any event when I reviewed all the calls and you:
1. eliminate Morris twins ( NCAA counted as one player ) and Mackey
2. eliminate calls under 3minutes as NCAA usually does

You get about 30 violations not 130 almost all of which apply to Senderhoff

]]> By: Sallad http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-39149 Sallad Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:06:10 +0000 http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/#comment-39149 I wouldn't trust a word that anyone named "Jo Potato" says. I wouldn't trust a word that anyone named “Jo Potato” says.

]]> By: Eamonn http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-39144 Eamonn Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:20:13 +0000 http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/#comment-39144 Indeed, peaychris: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Indeed, peaychris: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

]]> By: outanames http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-39147 outanames Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:17:39 +0000 http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/#comment-39147 I'm thinking Sampson made further comments (accusations) towards IU's compliance staff in his written statement to the NCAA of which they thought IU should see before submitting their written answers. I'm thinking Sampson made further comments (accusations) towards IU's compliance staff in his written statement to the NCAA of which they thought IU should see before submitting their written answers.

]]> By: wolfer http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-39146 wolfer Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:47:09 +0000 http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/#comment-39146 In the first place I could never understand why the hearings were held in the Pacific NW given that the NCAA's HQ and IU are about 50 miles from one another. So why be surprised by this move? You'd think the NCAA was sooooo busy investigating every member school that is why they drag these things out so much. The entire bunch of prima donas at the NCAA make me sic! The NCAA seems to be in conflict with it's own mission. Myles Brand has an ax to grind with IU and will stick it to IU 'til he dies! In the first place I could never understand why the hearings were held in the Pacific NW given that the NCAA's HQ and IU are about 50 miles from one another. So why be surprised by this move? You'd think the NCAA was sooooo busy investigating every member school that is why they drag these things out so much. The entire bunch of prima donas at the NCAA make me sic! The NCAA seems to be in conflict with it's own mission. Myles Brand has an ax to grind with IU and will stick it to IU 'til he dies!

]]> By: tberry http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-10716 tberry Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:15:13 +0000 http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/#comment-10716 This tells me either:<br><br>1. The NCAA can't meet their own deadline...or<br><br>2. There is some new revelation or information they have received or found in the investigation notes that they are now wanting to consider so they can make a more accurate appraisal of IU's response when it is received.<br><br>They can judge the coaches and IU separately by simply deciding to look at only the information pertinent to current focus of deliberation and keep the rest, unviewed until required. This tells me either:

1. The NCAA can't meet their own deadline…or

2. There is some new revelation or information they have received or found in the investigation notes that they are now wanting to consider so they can make a more accurate appraisal of IU's response when it is received.

They can judge the coaches and IU separately by simply deciding to look at only the information pertinent to current focus of deliberation and keep the rest, unviewed until required.

]]> By: peaychris http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-10710 peaychris Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:44:17 +0000 http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/#comment-10710 sorry E i could not put it as eloquently as you with your Quis custodiet ipsos custodes statement... but i hate how Brand used IU to take the job at the NCAA.. but what hurts worse is how sampson screwed the IU fathful who valued playing by the rules for decades before that "ass-clown" (to quote from office space, not quite Juvenal!!) i guess you could call me a bitter betty.. i live in alabama now and i see the crime that is SEC football and i thought our program was a beacon of hope that what college sports were supposed to be... sorry E i could not put it as eloquently as you with your Quis custodiet ipsos custodes statement… but i hate how Brand used IU to take the job at the NCAA.. but what hurts worse is how sampson screwed the IU fathful who valued playing by the rules for decades before that “ass-clown” (to quote from office space, not quite Juvenal!!) i guess you could call me a bitter betty.. i live in alabama now and i see the crime that is SEC football and i thought our program was a beacon of hope that what college sports were supposed to be…

]]> By: JerryCT http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-10714 JerryCT Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:19:51 +0000 http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/09/16/weird-the-ncaa-gives-iu-nine-more-days-to-respond-to-allegations/#comment-10714 His claim already stated that "if he had been aware..." thus shifting blame to compliance.<br><br>Any coach, with any sense and will to comply and in their right mind, who had just been severely penalized ...........would have demanded to know day by day the status of calls and visits.<br><br>Did he not know when the phone was handed to him ? He needed compliance to tell him ?<br><br>In any event when I reviewed all the calls and you:<br>1. eliminate Morris twins ( NCAA counted as one player ) and Mackey<br>2. eliminate calls under 3minutes as NCAA usually does<br><br>You get about 30 violations not 130 almost all of which apply to Senderhoff His claim already stated that “if he had been aware…” thus shifting blame to compliance.

Any coach, with any sense and will to comply and in their right mind, who had just been severely penalized ………..would have demanded to know day by day the status of calls and visits.

Did he not know when the phone was handed to him ? He needed compliance to tell him ?

In any event when I reviewed all the calls and you:
1. eliminate Morris twins ( NCAA counted as one player ) and Mackey
2. eliminate calls under 3minutes as NCAA usually does

You get about 30 violations not 130 almost all of which apply to Senderhoff

]]>