« The Morning After: Michigan State | Home | Which Hoosier team will show up? »

Dan Dakich audio from Big Ten teleconference

By Alex | March 3, 2008

Indiana interim head coach Dan Dakich addressed the media earlier today on the weekly Big Ten coaches’ teleconference. Here is the audio, courtesy of the Big Ten Network:


You can listen to the other ten coaches by clicking here.

Tags:

Posted in Media | Subscribe to Inside the Hall Subscribe via RSS |

Viewing 46 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Do any of you know Eli Holman's status?? Is he being red shirted,is he injured? If not,
    we are really missing out on what he could add on defense. In high school he averaged over 11 blocked shots per game. He has a huge wing span. I just think he has a great upside that we are not using. I am OK with keeping him out until next year if he is a red shirt. If he isn't the coaches blew this one and used up a year of the kids scholarship. I have tried to find a direct answer about this but I keep getting the runaround. I hope one of you can answer this question? Thanks
    • ^
    • v
    I believe he is a medical redshirt
    • ^
    • v
    there was a thing there that he was out when mike white became "unredshirted"
    and I know his grades weren't so hot in highschool...I agree we could of really used him this year
    • ^
    • v
    Yeah I'm pretty sure he is Medical Redshirted b/c of his wrist.
    • ^
    • v
    He'll actually be a sophomore next year, but could apply for the medical redshirt after his eligibility is up...I believe that's how it works...Just like DJ is listed as a senior this year, but if he really wanted, he could come back next year after applying for the medical redshirt
    • ^
    • v
    Wow that was 10 minutes I'll never get back. What ever happened to reporter's who could ask the good questions and the questions people really wanted answers to and being original instead of asking these status quo questions? I mean come one asking "how do you prepare for the next game after one like this?" "How do you react to the guys after this game?" etc etc. I've read that same questions from several different places. Are there any sports reporters left who can ask what people want to know about? I hate Jim Rome but he is a great interviewer. A couple of the local radio guys do good in my area (Louisville). And what was up with the Milwaukee guy asking about how he prepares against Wisconsin? WTF!!! I felt like reaching thru and bitch slapping him. You could tell DD was thinking "who's this idiot?" Didn't the idiot know he wasn't head coach at the time IU played Wisconsin and why would he be studying them now when their not playing them again? I hope he gets put back in the mailroom. I deal with the Courier Journal, Evening News and Tribune here and Evening news never gives much since its so small and the Tribune asked lame duck questions and the courier does good once in awhile. Afternoon Underdogs (Adam Neft is IU fan) do good and so does Lachland Mclean does good I wish they would get him on to interview him. Maybe they would ask about Mcghee and why he doesn't seem to be getting after them for whining to ref's and being lazy getting back into the plays. Well I'm done sorry but had to vent.
    • ^
    • v
    ...by "Mcghee", do you mean "Jordan Crawford"? Because Brandon *McGee didn't see an ounce of playing time against Michigan State.
    • ^
    • v
    it's absolutely crazy that Mcghee isn't good for a few minutes a game...what a waste of a year...i would be pissed if i was him...just like Johnson and Tapak...who the hell knows what you have as aplayer until you get accual game time minutes...in the MState game i would have sat most of the starters and played the reserves...at least they would have played with a little heart...i would rather lose by 30 with players giving all than players going thru the motions...
    • ^
    • v
    I hate the fact that DD has gone against his norm with coaching these guys. He was criticized at Bowling Green for being too tough and in your face....now he is the total opposite. If I recall wasn't Erik Suhr a walk on ? Look at how much he has meant to the IU program.

    McGhee not playing has puzzled me all year. Not in the sense he deserves to play cause he is on the team....but in the areas of what this team is lacking at times, KS, Dak, and NO ONE can tell me....Mike White, Kyle Tabar, and Deandre Thomas provide those things....even stemler. His "freshmen" mistakes cannot be any worse than EJ or Jordan......I would hate to lose him next season but it would not surprise. You may want to keep him around given Ebanks in on shakey ground.....

    I have a question on a Coach, I haven't thought it through totally.....

    Why NOT pat knight.....
    * Young coach like Scott Drew , Tony Bennett, and Keno Davis
    * Great coaching lineage....like drew, bennett, and davis
    * Understands the importance of running a clean program
    * Arguably has as much or more experience on the bench
    * Obvious he has Indiana ties, like Scott Drew and Tony Bennett
    * Different demeanor than ol' dad.....could relate better to todays AAU athlete

    Just a thought ........what do you think.....
    • ^
    • v
    Pat Knight? Are you kidding?
    • ^
    • v
    -58 points to Kansas and -40 something to A&M are around 98 reasons why not Pat Knight.

    Plus, he torched the same bridges his father did. He's unproven...and that's saying it nicely.
    • ^
    • v
    Sean tell me why NOT pat knight?
    I am not saying he should be hired but looking at other candidates I could see how he could/would compare.
    • ^
    • v
    First off, his resume is about as long as my &!($, and that ain't very long. Secondly, I for one am ready to step away from the tree (the bobby and IU tree). Way too many excellent hires out there to even have him on your long list, let alone short list. No offense buddy...I enjoy your posts...but have you been drinkin' this morning?

    As far as all of the talk about this current team...character issues...heart...grades..., etc. I personally will be a much happier camper here in about 2-3 years when we get back to recruiting "IU" caliber kids...blue collar...hard nosed...clean slate...good grades...love of the game...respect for the IU tradition. Now that's IU basketball. Someone here referenced recently a few games this year being "IU basketball". I ain't seen no "IU basketball" played for more than a few years.
    • ^
    • v
    I like the idea of Pat KNight but I think the timing is bad. I think he needs at least a couple years to prove himself as a head coach and recruiter. He has got a team that isn't that great. They did do good and beating Texas so that looks promising. But I think he needs to show he can pull in some decent recruits and get the tech climbing the rankins some before he should get a job at IU.
    • ^
    • v
    A little off topic but having caught some of the Gonzaga / Santa Clara game last night, I was reminded why I wanted Mark Few as our head coach. Anyone think this might be the right time to lure him away from the state of Washington?
    • ^
    • v
    He is the first call I make. He has the best resume outside of the Calhoun's, Coach K., B. Knight, Williams...etc. That man will hang banners in B'town.
    • ^
    • v
    Kelin:

    Who knows if P. Knight can recruit? That's my biggest concern. Well, that, and the fact that he'll only have about 10 games of head coaching experience after this year.
    (I actually think it would be hilarious if Texas Tech fired him after this year with a statement like, "Uh, we hired Bobby Knight, not his son. Just because Bobby stepped down doesn't mean that we have to retain Pat as head coach...)

    Not that I want anything bad to happen to Pat Knight, I just would find that hilarious. That may lead to the final straw of Bobby Knight flipping out and murdering several Texas Tech higher ups.

    My new wild card that i haven't heard anyone talk about is Lawrence Frank. He's a "Bobby Knight guy" (whatever that means) he has strong ties in the east coast (he could help land Ebanks and other east coast guys.) And he could throw the old "I know how to get guys into the NBA...I coached there and was relatively successful.)

    Not saying that I want him, i'd still take Pearl, Matta and maybe Bennett and Miller...but in terms of a long shot, Lawrence Frank maybe?
    • ^
    • v
    Pat Knight was used to recruit several players to Indiana. Sean Kline was one of them.
    • ^
    • v
    Tech also has 3 top players from the state of Texas coming in next year and Pat has been doing all of the off campus recruiting for a little over a year now.
    • ^
    • v
    just curious...is the sean kline recruitment a GOOD thing or a BAD thing in regards to pat knight??? Cuz I know where it stands with me...(excuse me while I vomit!) I certainly home you were giving this as the prime example as to why IU should NOT hire him.
    • ^
    • v
    Mikey D....I have not been drinking this morning although some of my students make me want to but consider what you said........

    YOu want a guy who can recruit.....
    Blue collar, hard nosed, clean slate, good grades, love of the game, and knows the IU tradition............

    Now Mike Davis couldn't do it....NON IU guy, Kelvin Sampson NON IU guy...

    Pat Knight knows the IU tradition, helped run a clean program, TTech kids with less talent, they do play hard...ask texas?

    We don't know if he can recruit, but we don't know that about any of the other YOUNG candidates..........I am not a Pat Knight guy but if you take away the name and look at the resume and what WE want you can't totally rule him out....

    I would take Pat Knight over Calipari
    • ^
    • v
    You make an excellent argument...though we're not arguing. Being 41 and having "been there" during the glory days, I just want the program to return to what it was in the 70's and 80's. Man, I love IU basketball like nothing else, and I really don't care where the next coach comes from (IU tree, RMK tree, banana tree). I just want a clean, winning program. Forget the whole tree thing. It just doesn't make sense to me to predicate interviewing pecking order on the tree/family. And I'm not saying that you are...I don't think you are.

    You've swayed me, though. Your points are well taken. BUT, with that being said, you gotta interview Alford too. His coaching career has been up and down. The down having been at Iowa, but put it into perspective. Can you really expect an IU guy to do well out in that corn field? Maybe we've all had jobs, or been on a team, whatever...where it's not the right fit...asshole for a boss...coach playing favorites...whatever. That might be the case with Alford. If you bring in an IU guy for the sake of bringing in an IU guy, then Alford needs to be your first interview. I'm not campaigning for him, but I believe in that statement.

    Pat Knight is now on my "medium" list. You're 100% right. I personally don't want Calipari, Pearl or Matta. Too much baggage and BS. This whole coach search is going to be very interesting. I just pray that we all don't get our minds blown again.
    • ^
    • v