<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surprise, surprise: Sampson ducks questions about major violations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddy</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39206</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39206</guid>
		<description>I did read the contract. And I know what it means.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IU has to give him due process and the chance to defend himself before they can fire him for cause. His significant, intentional or repetitive violation has to be proven with Sampson given a full chance to respond in an appropriate venue (such as an NCAA hearing). That is why Jim O&#039;Brien won his lawsuit against tOSU. They fired him for cause without giving him full due process and he ended up getting paid out as if they fired him without cause. Greenspan is handling this right if his intent is to fire Sampson for cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did read the contract. And I know what it means.</p>
<p>IU has to give him due process and the chance to defend himself before they can fire him for cause. His significant, intentional or repetitive violation has to be proven with Sampson given a full chance to respond in an appropriate venue (such as an NCAA hearing). That is why Jim O&#39;Brien won his lawsuit against tOSU. They fired him for cause without giving him full due process and he ended up getting paid out as if they fired him without cause. Greenspan is handling this right if his intent is to fire Sampson for cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoosiers07</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39233</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoosiers07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39233</guid>
		<description>Why blame it on the people covering what&#039;s happening? To ignore this story would be idiotic. Maybe they&#039;re focusing on this story because it&#039;s big news that&#039;ll affect the program that many of you clearly cheerlead for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why blame it on the people covering what&#39;s happening? To ignore this story would be idiotic. Maybe they&#39;re focusing on this story because it&#39;s big news that&#39;ll affect the program that many of you clearly cheerlead for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoosiers07</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39202</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoosiers07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39202</guid>
		<description>Normally the quality of conversation on here is pretty high, and I&#039;d hate to bring it down by insulting you. Suffice it to say that you&#039;ve got your head in the effing sand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normally the quality of conversation on here is pretty high, and I&#39;d hate to bring it down by insulting you. Suffice it to say that you&#39;ve got your head in the effing sand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALH_00</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39207</link>
		<dc:creator>ALH_00</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39207</guid>
		<description>why?  he already admitted to the impremissilbe phone calls.  That&#039;s failure to abide by NCAA rules.  He can be fired immediately.  Surely Sampson will fight to get his money, but what&#039;s one lawsuit compared to the integrity of the program...hasn&#039;t it been through enough?  cut the cord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why?  he already admitted to the impremissilbe phone calls.  That&#39;s failure to abide by NCAA rules.  He can be fired immediately.  Surely Sampson will fight to get his money, but what&#39;s one lawsuit compared to the integrity of the program&#8230;hasn&#39;t it been through enough?  cut the cord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39231</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39231</guid>
		<description>Do you really expect us to pretend this isn&#039;t happening? We talk plenty about the actual games, but when the head coach continuously embarrasses the university, we&#039;re left with no choice but to call it like it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you really expect us to pretend this isn&#39;t happening? We talk plenty about the actual games, but when the head coach continuously embarrasses the university, we&#39;re left with no choice but to call it like it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HoosierSmitty</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39221</link>
		<dc:creator>HoosierSmitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39221</guid>
		<description>I agree that it sucks we&#039;re talking about this, but blame the NCAA. They conveniently released this stuff to IU during our biggest stretch of the season. The NCAA should be held to a high standard and have a required time to respond when a university sends them information. Dropping a bomb like this on the Hoosiers at this time reeks of &quot;agenda.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It doesn&#039;t change the fact that our coach should have quite frankly &quot;known better.&quot; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;About the game....DJ got that horrible third foul call and disappeared. He missed his next three shots and never found rhythm again, almost like he was afraid that they&#039;d call a phantom charge on him for backing down his defender. We turned to EJ, who wasn&#039;t hitting from distance, but was penetrating, and making solid plays. That was what I noticed and I was in the stands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it sucks we&#39;re talking about this, but blame the NCAA. They conveniently released this stuff to IU during our biggest stretch of the season. The NCAA should be held to a high standard and have a required time to respond when a university sends them information. Dropping a bomb like this on the Hoosiers at this time reeks of &#8220;agenda.&#8221; </p>
<p>It doesn&#39;t change the fact that our coach should have quite frankly &#8220;known better.&#8221; </p>
<p>About the game&#8230;.DJ got that horrible third foul call and disappeared. He missed his next three shots and never found rhythm again, almost like he was afraid that they&#39;d call a phantom charge on him for backing down his defender. We turned to EJ, who wasn&#39;t hitting from distance, but was penetrating, and making solid plays. That was what I noticed and I was in the stands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39229</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39229</guid>
		<description>be easy on timmy, his diploma really took a hit this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>be easy on timmy, his diploma really took a hit this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: td</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39236</link>
		<dc:creator>td</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39236</guid>
		<description>For the sake of changing the subject, I have to smile when the NCAA uses the term student/athlete as if they really cared. If they really cared about kids sucessfully going to college, they would revisit the freshman eligibility rule. I like the idea of making the kids go to school for a year before declaring for the NBA, however it would make it a lot more interesting if colleges couldn&#039;t play them during that one year period. The schools would then have to weigh recruiting kids who might never wear that school&#039;s uniform. And, colleges would not become simply a parking space for one year. It&#039;s something the NBA certainly doesn&#039;t want as getting the colleges to look after these kids at no cost to the NBA is a sweet deal. Anyone notice the NBA didn&#039;t argue very loud when they started making the kids go to school for a year. This would change the recruiting landscape and return college basketball to what it should be, a true student/athlete experience. Let the one and dones play in the development league at the NBA&#039;s expense or go to junior college if they wish to forgo the 4-yr. college experience.  Shame on the colleges and the NCAA taking advantage of the one and dones and the dollars they help bring in to both during their one-year &quot;LEASE.&quot; Not all kids get an opportunity to experience the college life. It shouldn&#039;t be any different for basketball players, especially ones who have no interest in the student side of things. Recruiting would be a different kind of  difficult, however the need to cheat  in keeping fans and alumni happy would diminish. &lt;br&gt;None of this will ever happen as long as dollars are more important than the &quot;student/athlete&quot; which is forever in the eyes of you know who.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the sake of changing the subject, I have to smile when the NCAA uses the term student/athlete as if they really cared. If they really cared about kids sucessfully going to college, they would revisit the freshman eligibility rule. I like the idea of making the kids go to school for a year before declaring for the NBA, however it would make it a lot more interesting if colleges couldn&#39;t play them during that one year period. The schools would then have to weigh recruiting kids who might never wear that school&#39;s uniform. And, colleges would not become simply a parking space for one year. It&#39;s something the NBA certainly doesn&#39;t want as getting the colleges to look after these kids at no cost to the NBA is a sweet deal. Anyone notice the NBA didn&#39;t argue very loud when they started making the kids go to school for a year. This would change the recruiting landscape and return college basketball to what it should be, a true student/athlete experience. Let the one and dones play in the development league at the NBA&#39;s expense or go to junior college if they wish to forgo the 4-yr. college experience.  Shame on the colleges and the NCAA taking advantage of the one and dones and the dollars they help bring in to both during their one-year &#8220;LEASE.&#8221; Not all kids get an opportunity to experience the college life. It shouldn&#39;t be any different for basketball players, especially ones who have no interest in the student side of things. Recruiting would be a different kind of  difficult, however the need to cheat  in keeping fans and alumni happy would diminish. <br />None of this will ever happen as long as dollars are more important than the &#8220;student/athlete&#8221; which is forever in the eyes of you know who.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt J.</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39210</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39210</guid>
		<description>No!  No, no, no, no Rick Barnes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That would be a huge step back.  Maybe he runs a clean program, but he&#039;s a consistent underachiever.  Do you really want IU bowing out in the first round of the NCAA tournament every year?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What about Scott Drew?  He cleaned up the Baylor mess very well, which was in a whole lot more dire situation than Indiana&#039;s current troubles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No!  No, no, no, no Rick Barnes.</p>
<p>That would be a huge step back.  Maybe he runs a clean program, but he&#39;s a consistent underachiever.  Do you really want IU bowing out in the first round of the NCAA tournament every year?</p>
<p>What about Scott Drew?  He cleaned up the Baylor mess very well, which was in a whole lot more dire situation than Indiana&#39;s current troubles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoveyDale</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39227</link>
		<dc:creator>CoveyDale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39227</guid>
		<description>he&#039;s returned us to relevance?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;more like he&#039;s made our program look like trash and disgraced the Indiana basketball tradition.  sampson hasn&#039;t &quot;earned&quot; anything.  he cheated at oklahoma and he cheated AND lied here.  he should be fired immediately.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;pull your head out of your ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>he&#39;s returned us to relevance?</p>
<p>more like he&#39;s made our program look like trash and disgraced the Indiana basketball tradition.  sampson hasn&#39;t &#8220;earned&#8221; anything.  he cheated at oklahoma and he cheated AND lied here.  he should be fired immediately.</p>
<p>pull your head out of your ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmy</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39218</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39218</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t see the game which is another reason it sucks that instead of the usual morning after post we get the crap about Coach.  Was DJ forgotten about in the 2nd half or did UW do something to adjust which would make EJ take over?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#39;t see the game which is another reason it sucks that instead of the usual morning after post we get the crap about Coach.  Was DJ forgotten about in the 2nd half or did UW do something to adjust which would make EJ take over?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmy</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39225</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39225</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t you learn anything from O&#039;Brien and Ohio State?  Give Coach his day in court, he&#039;s returned IU basketball to relevence so I think he&#039;s earned the chance to defend himself with the NCAA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#39;t you learn anything from O&#39;Brien and Ohio State?  Give Coach his day in court, he&#39;s returned IU basketball to relevence so I think he&#39;s earned the chance to defend himself with the NCAA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoveyDale</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39223</link>
		<dc:creator>CoveyDale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39223</guid>
		<description>&quot;how many different ways can you say the same thing without it becoming white noise?&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;how many times sampson can lie and cheat without being fired?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;how many different ways can you say the same thing without it becoming white noise?&#8221;</p>
<p>how many times sampson can lie and cheat without being fired?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesHardy</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39216</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesHardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39216</guid>
		<description>good call...the problem is...I put that loss on KS last night. Every time we&#039;ve lost this year its been a result of KS getting out coached. So we have a cheater who&#039;s not that good of a Xs and Os coach. It&#039;s a shame that DJ was forgotten about in the 2nd half last night...cuz the Badgers had NO answer for him defensively. I&#039;m not going to blame the officials for 1 missed travel call...I honestly think that was the most consistently officiated games I&#039;ve seen this year in the Big 10.  On a positive note, it was nice to see EJ look good in the 2nd half last night. It&#039;s a shame his game isn&#039;t mroe balanced to where he could put up 10-12 points in each half instead of 3 in one half and 20 in the next or 1 and 17 like the Illinois game. By going DJ in the 1st and EJ in the 2nd, Kelvin is becoming predictable and it makes the job of the opposing coach that much easier to stop our offense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good call&#8230;the problem is&#8230;I put that loss on KS last night. Every time we&#39;ve lost this year its been a result of KS getting out coached. So we have a cheater who&#39;s not that good of a Xs and Os coach. It&#39;s a shame that DJ was forgotten about in the 2nd half last night&#8230;cuz the Badgers had NO answer for him defensively. I&#39;m not going to blame the officials for 1 missed travel call&#8230;I honestly think that was the most consistently officiated games I&#39;ve seen this year in the Big 10.  On a positive note, it was nice to see EJ look good in the 2nd half last night. It&#39;s a shame his game isn&#39;t mroe balanced to where he could put up 10-12 points in each half instead of 3 in one half and 20 in the next or 1 and 17 like the Illinois game. By going DJ in the 1st and EJ in the 2nd, Kelvin is becoming predictable and it makes the job of the opposing coach that much easier to stop our offense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesHardy</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39235</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesHardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39235</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it IRONIC that a guy who&#039;s charged with TALKING too much on cell phones and 3-way calls would clam up when asked to speak? What a punk b!tch!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the reports are true...i.e. Sampson will be fired on Friday...does that mean that all the other coaches who are named in the allegations will be replaced as well? As an educator that sees athletes get all the free passes in the world, I have to say that this is one time I would like to see an institution of higher learning put integrity, morality, and COMMON freakin SENSE above all other aspects. Yes, I&#039;m a life-long Hoosier and I&#039;m aware of the &quot;basketball is life&quot; mentality. My 5 year old son is already well on his way to getting a history lesson of IU athletics, Notre Dame athletics, Purdue athletics (mostly b/c a former Purdue alum is a big part of our church and school). But the last thing I want to explain to my 5 year old is that &quot;winning at all costs&quot; is the philosophy of my alma mater.  I&#039;m not sold on the fact that we need a &quot;high profile&quot; coach. Look at what happened when we went high profile this time. Let&#039;s hire a coach based on his morals and integrity as opposed to his win-loss record. The top 2 I can think of right off the top of my head are 1. Mark Few and 2. Scott Drew.  I&#039;m sick of watching talented teams in Bloomington go to waste because our coach (or should I say last two coaches) have a horrendous philosphy for college basketball. They both belong on NBA staffs based on their 1 on 1 philosophy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#39;t it IRONIC that a guy who&#39;s charged with TALKING too much on cell phones and 3-way calls would clam up when asked to speak? What a punk b!tch!</p>
<p>If the reports are true&#8230;i.e. Sampson will be fired on Friday&#8230;does that mean that all the other coaches who are named in the allegations will be replaced as well? As an educator that sees athletes get all the free passes in the world, I have to say that this is one time I would like to see an institution of higher learning put integrity, morality, and COMMON freakin SENSE above all other aspects. Yes, I&#39;m a life-long Hoosier and I&#39;m aware of the &#8220;basketball is life&#8221; mentality. My 5 year old son is already well on his way to getting a history lesson of IU athletics, Notre Dame athletics, Purdue athletics (mostly b/c a former Purdue alum is a big part of our church and school). But the last thing I want to explain to my 5 year old is that &#8220;winning at all costs&#8221; is the philosophy of my alma mater.  I&#39;m not sold on the fact that we need a &#8220;high profile&#8221; coach. Look at what happened when we went high profile this time. Let&#39;s hire a coach based on his morals and integrity as opposed to his win-loss record. The top 2 I can think of right off the top of my head are 1. Mark Few and 2. Scott Drew.  I&#39;m sick of watching talented teams in Bloomington go to waste because our coach (or should I say last two coaches) have a horrendous philosphy for college basketball. They both belong on NBA staffs based on their 1 on 1 philosophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmy</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39215</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39215</guid>
		<description>This is complete bullshit.  We are in the middle of the three biggest games of the year and you guys are focusing on this crap.  Why can&#039;t you make this site an oasis to talk about the actual basketball instead of the fire sampson rhetoric?  We get it, you want Sampson gone but how many different ways can you say the same thing without it becoming white noise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is complete bullshit.  We are in the middle of the three biggest games of the year and you guys are focusing on this crap.  Why can&#39;t you make this site an oasis to talk about the actual basketball instead of the fire sampson rhetoric?  We get it, you want Sampson gone but how many different ways can you say the same thing without it becoming white noise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoveyDale</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39204</link>
		<dc:creator>CoveyDale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39204</guid>
		<description>read sampson&#039;s contract.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IU can fire KS if there is &quot;a signifcant, intentional, repetitve violation of any NCAA law, rule or regulation.&quot;  That is in writing in the contract.  They will not be on the hook for any of the $5 mil you talk about.  In fact, if they do fire him, they&#039;ll only owe him his salary through the rest of that month.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sampson is like a criminal defendant who has already robbed a convience store and robbed another one.  i think it&#039;s ridiculous for any of us to presume he&#039;s innocent and frankly, he hasn&#039;t earned the benefit of the doubt from IU fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>read sampson&#39;s contract.</p>
<p>IU can fire KS if there is &#8220;a signifcant, intentional, repetitve violation of any NCAA law, rule or regulation.&#8221;  That is in writing in the contract.  They will not be on the hook for any of the $5 mil you talk about.  In fact, if they do fire him, they&#39;ll only owe him his salary through the rest of that month.</p>
<p>Sampson is like a criminal defendant who has already robbed a convience store and robbed another one.  i think it&#39;s ridiculous for any of us to presume he&#39;s innocent and frankly, he hasn&#39;t earned the benefit of the doubt from IU fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39199</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39199</guid>
		<description>Sherron,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s not negativity. At this point, it&#039;s reality, my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sherron,</p>
<p>It&#39;s not negativity. At this point, it&#39;s reality, my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoveyDale</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-39213</link>
		<dc:creator>CoveyDale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-39213</guid>
		<description>2000: knight fired&lt;br&gt;2001-02: miracle run to championship game&lt;br&gt;2003-04: worst season ever&lt;br&gt;2004-05: NIT&lt;br&gt;early 2006: davis fired&lt;br&gt;late 2006: eric gordon recruiting saga&lt;br&gt;2007: new violations for sampson&lt;br&gt;yesterday: NCAA responds&lt;br&gt;april 2008: sampson fired&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;this has been the most ridiculous decade in IU basketball history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2000: knight fired<br />2001-02: miracle run to championship game<br />2003-04: worst season ever<br />2004-05: NIT<br />early 2006: davis fired<br />late 2006: eric gordon recruiting saga<br />2007: new violations for sampson<br />yesterday: NCAA responds<br />april 2008: sampson fired</p>
<p>this has been the most ridiculous decade in IU basketball history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddy</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/comment-page-1/#comment-19731</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/02/13/surprise-suprise-sampson-ducks-questions-about-sanctions/#comment-19731</guid>
		<description>I did read the contract. And I know what it means.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;IU has to give him due process and the chance to defend himself before they can fire him for cause. His significant, intentional or repetitive violation has to be proven with Sampson given a full chance to respond in an appropriate venue (such as an NCAA hearing). That is why Jim O&#039;Brien won his lawsuit against tOSU. They fired him for cause without giving him full due process and he ended up getting paid out as if they fired him without cause. Greenspan is handling this right if his intent is to fire Sampson for cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did read the contract. And I know what it means.</p>
<p>IU has to give him due process and the chance to defend himself before they can fire him for cause. His significant, intentional or repetitive violation has to be proven with Sampson given a full chance to respond in an appropriate venue (such as an NCAA hearing). That is why Jim O&#39;Brien won his lawsuit against tOSU. They fired him for cause without giving him full due process and he ended up getting paid out as if they fired him without cause. Greenspan is handling this right if his intent is to fire Sampson for cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 478/479 objects using apc

Served from: insidethehall.com @ 2012-02-10 01:50:01 -->
