<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Huskies win rebounding battle, beat Hoosiers 68-63</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/01/26/huskies-win-rebounding-battle-beat-hoosiers-68-63/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/01/26/huskies-win-rebounding-battle-beat-hoosiers-68-63/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:56:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kreigh_Smiths-Short_Shorts</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/01/26/huskies-win-rebounding-battle-beat-hoosiers-68-63/comment-page-1/#comment-40971</link>
		<dc:creator>kreigh_Smiths-Short_Shorts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/01/26/huskies-win-rebounding-battle-beat-hoosiers-68-63/#comment-40971</guid>
		<description>UGH.  Well, I guess it&#039;s not a huge surprise.  I&#039;m sure there are going to be lots of people out there saying, &quot;I told you so.&quot;  I don&#039;t want to be a doomsayer but the lack of competition so far this season seems to have padded the record and IU is probably not as good as what  you would expect from a 17-1 (now 17-2) team.  UConn is tough, but probably no tougher than MSU or Wisconsin is.  The upside is that IU will learn and develop from this.  I can&#039;t stand that they came to AH and took one though.  Fortunately, it&#039;s not a Big Ten team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UGH.  Well, I guess it&#39;s not a huge surprise.  I&#39;m sure there are going to be lots of people out there saying, &#8220;I told you so.&#8221;  I don&#39;t want to be a doomsayer but the lack of competition so far this season seems to have padded the record and IU is probably not as good as what  you would expect from a 17-1 (now 17-2) team.  UConn is tough, but probably no tougher than MSU or Wisconsin is.  The upside is that IU will learn and develop from this.  I can&#39;t stand that they came to AH and took one though.  Fortunately, it&#39;s not a Big Ten team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoveyDale</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/01/26/huskies-win-rebounding-battle-beat-hoosiers-68-63/comment-page-1/#comment-40970</link>
		<dc:creator>CoveyDale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/01/26/huskies-win-rebounding-battle-beat-hoosiers-68-63/#comment-40970</guid>
		<description>im not a coach and i wont pretend to be, but i have to wonder: what was that gameplan?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;why was IU insisting on going inside and right into the teeth of the uconn defense?  i dont usually condone hucking up 40 3&#039;s but this was the kind of game where IU should&#039;ve been settling for three-pointers.  3-21 from 2pt and 4-7 for 3pt in the first half. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;uconn is extremely physical and athletic and i thought it was a big mistake to play to their strength.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im not a coach and i wont pretend to be, but i have to wonder: what was that gameplan?</p>
<p>why was IU insisting on going inside and right into the teeth of the uconn defense?  i dont usually condone hucking up 40 3&#39;s but this was the kind of game where IU should&#39;ve been settling for three-pointers.  3-21 from 2pt and 4-7 for 3pt in the first half. </p>
<p>uconn is extremely physical and athletic and i thought it was a big mistake to play to their strength.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbie G</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/01/26/huskies-win-rebounding-battle-beat-hoosiers-68-63/comment-page-1/#comment-40969</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbie G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/01/26/huskies-win-rebounding-battle-beat-hoosiers-68-63/#comment-40969</guid>
		<description>was this mike davis or sampson coaching this game?  we totally got outcoached.  Also, DeAndre should&#039;ve been in the game more.  I know he missed easy shots, but we needed a big guy at the four to get rebounds.  DJ cant get every rebound off the ten foot guy.  it also doesnt help when the refs dont call anything off uconn.  i also thought that ej and ellis played terrible today.  we need this wisconsin win badly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was this mike davis or sampson coaching this game?  we totally got outcoached.  Also, DeAndre should&#39;ve been in the game more.  I know he missed easy shots, but we needed a big guy at the four to get rebounds.  DJ cant get every rebound off the ten foot guy.  it also doesnt help when the refs dont call anything off uconn.  i also thought that ej and ellis played terrible today.  we need this wisconsin win badly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kreigh_Smiths-Short_Shorts</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/01/26/huskies-win-rebounding-battle-beat-hoosiers-68-63/comment-page-1/#comment-17628</link>
		<dc:creator>kreigh_Smiths-Short_Shorts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/01/26/huskies-win-rebounding-battle-beat-hoosiers-68-63/#comment-17628</guid>
		<description>UGH.  Well, I guess it&#039;s not a huge surprise.  I&#039;m sure there are going to be lots of people out there saying, &quot;I told you so.&quot;  I don&#039;t want to be a doomsayer but the lack of competition so far this season seems to have padded the record and IU is probably not as good as what  you would expect from a 17-1 (now 17-2) team.  UConn is tough, but probably no tougher than MSU or Wisconsin is.  The upside is that IU will learn and develop from this.  I can&#039;t stand that they came to AH and took one though.  Fortunately, it&#039;s not a Big Ten team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UGH.  Well, I guess it&#39;s not a huge surprise.  I&#39;m sure there are going to be lots of people out there saying, &#8220;I told you so.&#8221;  I don&#39;t want to be a doomsayer but the lack of competition so far this season seems to have padded the record and IU is probably not as good as what  you would expect from a 17-1 (now 17-2) team.  UConn is tough, but probably no tougher than MSU or Wisconsin is.  The upside is that IU will learn and develop from this.  I can&#39;t stand that they came to AH and took one though.  Fortunately, it&#39;s not a Big Ten team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoveyDale</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/01/26/huskies-win-rebounding-battle-beat-hoosiers-68-63/comment-page-1/#comment-17602</link>
		<dc:creator>CoveyDale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/01/26/huskies-win-rebounding-battle-beat-hoosiers-68-63/#comment-17602</guid>
		<description>im not a coach and i wont pretend to be, but i have to wonder: what was that gameplan?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;why was IU insisting on going inside and right into the teeth of the uconn defense?  i dont usually condone hucking up 40 3&#039;s but this was the kind of game where IU should&#039;ve been settling for three-pointers.  3-21 from 2pt and 4-7 for 3pt in the first half. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;uconn is extremely physical and athletic and i thought it was a big mistake to play to their strength.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im not a coach and i wont pretend to be, but i have to wonder: what was that gameplan?</p>
<p>why was IU insisting on going inside and right into the teeth of the uconn defense?  i dont usually condone hucking up 40 3&#39;s but this was the kind of game where IU should&#39;ve been settling for three-pointers.  3-21 from 2pt and 4-7 for 3pt in the first half. </p>
<p>uconn is extremely physical and athletic and i thought it was a big mistake to play to their strength.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbie G</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/01/26/huskies-win-rebounding-battle-beat-hoosiers-68-63/comment-page-1/#comment-17545</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbie G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2008/01/26/huskies-win-rebounding-battle-beat-hoosiers-68-63/#comment-17545</guid>
		<description>was this mike davis or sampson coaching this game?  we totally got outcoached.  Also, DeAndre should&#039;ve been in the game more.  I know he missed easy shots, but we needed a big guy at the four to get rebounds.  DJ cant get every rebound off the ten foot guy.  it also doesnt help when the refs dont call anything off uconn.  i also thought that ej and ellis played terrible today.  we need this wisconsin win badly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was this mike davis or sampson coaching this game?  we totally got outcoached.  Also, DeAndre should&#39;ve been in the game more.  I know he missed easy shots, but we needed a big guy at the four to get rebounds.  DJ cant get every rebound off the ten foot guy.  it also doesnt help when the refs dont call anything off uconn.  i also thought that ej and ellis played terrible today.  we need this wisconsin win badly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
