<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the non-conference schedule too soft? Yes, it is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 15:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-4515</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-4515</guid>
		<description>Cup Cake City Baby!  Big Ten away games will be an entirely new experience for the new comers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cup Cake City Baby!  Big Ten away games will be an entirely new experience for the new comers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-66057</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-66057</guid>
		<description>Cup Cake City Baby!  Big Ten away games will be an entirely new experience for the new comers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cup Cake City Baby!  Big Ten away games will be an entirely new experience for the new comers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-66058</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-66058</guid>
		<description>Cup Cake City Baby!  Big Ten away games will be an entirely new experience for the new comers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cup Cake City Baby!  Big Ten away games will be an entirely new experience for the new comers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-4498</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-4498</guid>
		<description>Just watching Pitt/Duke at the Garden tonight (12/20) makes me agree with you.  What a physical battle - two big-time programs battling it out to overtime.  A close loss to a ranked program on a neutral floor at this point doesn&#039;t hurt you that bad - but a win would be huge on Selection Sunday.  I agree with some of the other posters that even a Louisville (not looking so good now) or a Butler would have been a good test this preseason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just watching Pitt/Duke at the Garden tonight (12/20) makes me agree with you.  What a physical battle &#8211; two big-time programs battling it out to overtime.  A close loss to a ranked program on a neutral floor at this point doesn&#8217;t hurt you that bad &#8211; but a win would be huge on Selection Sunday.  I agree with some of the other posters that even a Louisville (not looking so good now) or a Butler would have been a good test this preseason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-66055</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-66055</guid>
		<description>Just watching Pitt/Duke at the Garden tonight (12/20) makes me agree with you.  What a physical battle - two big-time programs battling it out to overtime.  A close loss to a ranked program on a neutral floor at this point doesn&#039;t hurt you that bad - but a win would be huge on Selection Sunday.  I agree with some of the other posters that even a Louisville (not looking so good now) or a Butler would have been a good test this preseason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just watching Pitt/Duke at the Garden tonight (12/20) makes me agree with you.  What a physical battle &#8211; two big-time programs battling it out to overtime.  A close loss to a ranked program on a neutral floor at this point doesn&#8217;t hurt you that bad &#8211; but a win would be huge on Selection Sunday.  I agree with some of the other posters that even a Louisville (not looking so good now) or a Butler would have been a good test this preseason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-66056</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-66056</guid>
		<description>Just watching Pitt/Duke at the Garden tonight (12/20) makes me agree with you.  What a physical battle - two big-time programs battling it out to overtime.  A close loss to a ranked program on a neutral floor at this point doesn&#039;t hurt you that bad - but a win would be huge on Selection Sunday.  I agree with some of the other posters that even a Louisville (not looking so good now) or a Butler would have been a good test this preseason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just watching Pitt/Duke at the Garden tonight (12/20) makes me agree with you.  What a physical battle &#8211; two big-time programs battling it out to overtime.  A close loss to a ranked program on a neutral floor at this point doesn&#8217;t hurt you that bad &#8211; but a win would be huge on Selection Sunday.  I agree with some of the other posters that even a Louisville (not looking so good now) or a Butler would have been a good test this preseason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-4445</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-4445</guid>
		<description>Did you look at the schedule before the season started and lament the fact that it was too soft?  If you did, you didn&#039;t write about it then.  I think you, as most people, saw it as a pretty well rounded non conference line-up.  A few decent tests with some powder puffs sprinkled in.
My point is that it&#039;s hard to tell exactly what you&#039;re going to get when you schedule these things in advance.  Sure, we could have scheduled a couple more away games, but with all the neutral court games we&#039;ve played, I&#039;m not all that worried about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you look at the schedule before the season started and lament the fact that it was too soft?  If you did, you didn&#8217;t write about it then.  I think you, as most people, saw it as a pretty well rounded non conference line-up.  A few decent tests with some powder puffs sprinkled in.<br />
My point is that it&#8217;s hard to tell exactly what you&#8217;re going to get when you schedule these things in advance.  Sure, we could have scheduled a couple more away games, but with all the neutral court games we&#8217;ve played, I&#8217;m not all that worried about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-66063</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-66063</guid>
		<description>Did you look at the schedule before the season started and lament the fact that it was too soft?  If you did, you didn&#039;t write about it then.  I think you, as most people, saw it as a pretty well rounded non conference line-up.  A few decent tests with some powder puffs sprinkled in.
My point is that it&#039;s hard to tell exactly what you&#039;re going to get when you schedule these things in advance.  Sure, we could have scheduled a couple more away games, but with all the neutral court games we&#039;ve played, I&#039;m not all that worried about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you look at the schedule before the season started and lament the fact that it was too soft?  If you did, you didn&#8217;t write about it then.  I think you, as most people, saw it as a pretty well rounded non conference line-up.  A few decent tests with some powder puffs sprinkled in.<br />
My point is that it&#8217;s hard to tell exactly what you&#8217;re going to get when you schedule these things in advance.  Sure, we could have scheduled a couple more away games, but with all the neutral court games we&#8217;ve played, I&#8217;m not all that worried about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-66064</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-66064</guid>
		<description>Did you look at the schedule before the season started and lament the fact that it was too soft?  If you did, you didn&#039;t write about it then.  I think you, as most people, saw it as a pretty well rounded non conference line-up.  A few decent tests with some powder puffs sprinkled in.
My point is that it&#039;s hard to tell exactly what you&#039;re going to get when you schedule these things in advance.  Sure, we could have scheduled a couple more away games, but with all the neutral court games we&#039;ve played, I&#039;m not all that worried about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you look at the schedule before the season started and lament the fact that it was too soft?  If you did, you didn&#8217;t write about it then.  I think you, as most people, saw it as a pretty well rounded non conference line-up.  A few decent tests with some powder puffs sprinkled in.<br />
My point is that it&#8217;s hard to tell exactly what you&#8217;re going to get when you schedule these things in advance.  Sure, we could have scheduled a couple more away games, but with all the neutral court games we&#8217;ve played, I&#8217;m not all that worried about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALH '00</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-4439</link>
		<dc:creator>ALH '00</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-4439</guid>
		<description>Agreed that the schedule is week, but games are games, and I like the way they are won, even if the victory was &quot;scheduled&quot;.

&quot;Did we really get any better beating Western Carolina by 48? I think not.&quot;

Probably.  This team is young, so to come out and dominate a lesser opponent shows that they are focused.  Also, we got some key players on the bench some minutes.  It may not be as big as winning a tough road game, but I definately think the team improved during that game.

&quot;If you don’t play any road games early and learn to win away from the friendly confines, how do you expect to win when it counts?&quot;

Focus.  Leadership.  We have DJ, and EJ can play like a senior.  Ellis has been around.  Crawford continues to get better.   On the other hand, their &quot;tough&quot; neutral court game against Xavier didn&#039;t turn out too well.  So, we&#039;ll see.  It&#039;s hard to look too negative on this team when the talent level is so high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed that the schedule is week, but games are games, and I like the way they are won, even if the victory was &#8220;scheduled&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Did we really get any better beating Western Carolina by 48? I think not.&#8221;</p>
<p>Probably.  This team is young, so to come out and dominate a lesser opponent shows that they are focused.  Also, we got some key players on the bench some minutes.  It may not be as big as winning a tough road game, but I definately think the team improved during that game.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you don’t play any road games early and learn to win away from the friendly confines, how do you expect to win when it counts?&#8221;</p>
<p>Focus.  Leadership.  We have DJ, and EJ can play like a senior.  Ellis has been around.  Crawford continues to get better.   On the other hand, their &#8220;tough&#8221; neutral court game against Xavier didn&#8217;t turn out too well.  So, we&#8217;ll see.  It&#8217;s hard to look too negative on this team when the talent level is so high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALH '00</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-66107</link>
		<dc:creator>ALH '00</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-66107</guid>
		<description>Agreed that the schedule is week, but games are games, and I like the way they are won, even if the victory was &quot;scheduled&quot;.

&quot;Did we really get any better beating Western Carolina by 48? I think not.&quot;

Probably.  This team is young, so to come out and dominate a lesser opponent shows that they are focused.  Also, we got some key players on the bench some minutes.  It may not be as big as winning a tough road game, but I definately think the team improved during that game.

&quot;If you don’t play any road games early and learn to win away from the friendly confines, how do you expect to win when it counts?&quot;

Focus.  Leadership.  We have DJ, and EJ can play like a senior.  Ellis has been around.  Crawford continues to get better.   On the other hand, their &quot;tough&quot; neutral court game against Xavier didn&#039;t turn out too well.  So, we&#039;ll see.  It&#039;s hard to look too negative on this team when the talent level is so high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed that the schedule is week, but games are games, and I like the way they are won, even if the victory was &#8220;scheduled&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Did we really get any better beating Western Carolina by 48? I think not.&#8221;</p>
<p>Probably.  This team is young, so to come out and dominate a lesser opponent shows that they are focused.  Also, we got some key players on the bench some minutes.  It may not be as big as winning a tough road game, but I definately think the team improved during that game.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you don’t play any road games early and learn to win away from the friendly confines, how do you expect to win when it counts?&#8221;</p>
<p>Focus.  Leadership.  We have DJ, and EJ can play like a senior.  Ellis has been around.  Crawford continues to get better.   On the other hand, their &#8220;tough&#8221; neutral court game against Xavier didn&#8217;t turn out too well.  So, we&#8217;ll see.  It&#8217;s hard to look too negative on this team when the talent level is so high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-4423</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-4423</guid>
		<description>Tom,

Per your 3:52 pm comment: Well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>Per your 3:52 pm comment: Well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-66067</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-66067</guid>
		<description>Tom,

Per your 3:52 pm comment: Well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>Per your 3:52 pm comment: Well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-66068</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-66068</guid>
		<description>Tom,

Per your 3:52 pm comment: Well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>Per your 3:52 pm comment: Well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-4416</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-4416</guid>
		<description>What ever the SOS is I would love to see Hoosier fans stop complaining and JUST INJOY THIS TEAM, as they grow!!!....Why is that so hard for so many people???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ever the SOS is I would love to see Hoosier fans stop complaining and JUST INJOY THIS TEAM, as they grow!!!&#8230;.Why is that so hard for so many people???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-66065</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-66065</guid>
		<description>What ever the SOS is I would love to see Hoosier fans stop complaining and JUST INJOY THIS TEAM, as they grow!!!....Why is that so hard for so many people???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ever the SOS is I would love to see Hoosier fans stop complaining and JUST INJOY THIS TEAM, as they grow!!!&#8230;.Why is that so hard for so many people???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-66066</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 07:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-66066</guid>
		<description>What ever the SOS is I would love to see Hoosier fans stop complaining and JUST INJOY THIS TEAM, as they grow!!!....Why is that so hard for so many people???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ever the SOS is I would love to see Hoosier fans stop complaining and JUST INJOY THIS TEAM, as they grow!!!&#8230;.Why is that so hard for so many people???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MPmike</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-4400</link>
		<dc:creator>MPmike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-4400</guid>
		<description>I agree that IU has a weaker schedule this year, but, I heard Kelvin Sampson talk about how the schedule is made and he stated that the schedule is made in advance. UK is down and the Big Ten/ACC challenge is selected by last year&#039;s conference finish, so IU can&#039;t control whatever happens the following year.  However, IU has played two quality opponents (Xavier, So ILL) away from the HAll and Chattanooga gave Tennesee all that they can handle--score was 70-76. We beat them by 20. 

If you can remember a few years back when IU didn&#039;t make the tournament because of a really tough pre- Big Ten Conference schedule. I believe IU&#039;s schedule was ranked in the top 5. IU started out at 2-7 during that stretch and could never catch up and did not have any quality wins. IU ended up 15-14 and NIT bound. So, having a tough schedule can only help when you win games just ask Davidson. Finally, last year Ohio State had a pretty weak pre-conference schedule with the exception of two games-Florida and UNC. Ohio State dominated the conference and ended up in the championship. IU fans can look forward to the the rest of the season with a team that will have better chemistry and loads of confidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that IU has a weaker schedule this year, but, I heard Kelvin Sampson talk about how the schedule is made and he stated that the schedule is made in advance. UK is down and the Big Ten/ACC challenge is selected by last year&#8217;s conference finish, so IU can&#8217;t control whatever happens the following year.  However, IU has played two quality opponents (Xavier, So ILL) away from the HAll and Chattanooga gave Tennesee all that they can handle&#8211;score was 70-76. We beat them by 20. </p>
<p>If you can remember a few years back when IU didn&#8217;t make the tournament because of a really tough pre- Big Ten Conference schedule. I believe IU&#8217;s schedule was ranked in the top 5. IU started out at 2-7 during that stretch and could never catch up and did not have any quality wins. IU ended up 15-14 and NIT bound. So, having a tough schedule can only help when you win games just ask Davidson. Finally, last year Ohio State had a pretty weak pre-conference schedule with the exception of two games-Florida and UNC. Ohio State dominated the conference and ended up in the championship. IU fans can look forward to the the rest of the season with a team that will have better chemistry and loads of confidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MPmike</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-66061</link>
		<dc:creator>MPmike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-66061</guid>
		<description>I agree that IU has a weaker schedule this year, but, I heard Kelvin Sampson talk about how the schedule is made and he stated that the schedule is made in advance. UK is down and the Big Ten/ACC challenge is selected by last year&#039;s conference finish, so IU can&#039;t control whatever happens the following year.  However, IU has played two quality opponents (Xavier, So ILL) away from the HAll and Chattanooga gave Tennesee all that they can handle--score was 70-76. We beat them by 20. 

If you can remember a few years back when IU didn&#039;t make the tournament because of a really tough pre- Big Ten Conference schedule. I believe IU&#039;s schedule was ranked in the top 5. IU started out at 2-7 during that stretch and could never catch up and did not have any quality wins. IU ended up 15-14 and NIT bound. So, having a tough schedule can only help when you win games just ask Davidson. Finally, last year Ohio State had a pretty weak pre-conference schedule with the exception of two games-Florida and UNC. Ohio State dominated the conference and ended up in the championship. IU fans can look forward to the the rest of the season with a team that will have better chemistry and loads of confidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that IU has a weaker schedule this year, but, I heard Kelvin Sampson talk about how the schedule is made and he stated that the schedule is made in advance. UK is down and the Big Ten/ACC challenge is selected by last year&#8217;s conference finish, so IU can&#8217;t control whatever happens the following year.  However, IU has played two quality opponents (Xavier, So ILL) away from the HAll and Chattanooga gave Tennesee all that they can handle&#8211;score was 70-76. We beat them by 20. </p>
<p>If you can remember a few years back when IU didn&#8217;t make the tournament because of a really tough pre- Big Ten Conference schedule. I believe IU&#8217;s schedule was ranked in the top 5. IU started out at 2-7 during that stretch and could never catch up and did not have any quality wins. IU ended up 15-14 and NIT bound. So, having a tough schedule can only help when you win games just ask Davidson. Finally, last year Ohio State had a pretty weak pre-conference schedule with the exception of two games-Florida and UNC. Ohio State dominated the conference and ended up in the championship. IU fans can look forward to the the rest of the season with a team that will have better chemistry and loads of confidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MPmike</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/comment-page-2/#comment-66062</link>
		<dc:creator>MPmike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/12/17/is-the-non-conference-schedule-too-soft-yes-it-is/#comment-66062</guid>
		<description>I agree that IU has a weaker schedule this year, but, I heard Kelvin Sampson talk about how the schedule is made and he stated that the schedule is made in advance. UK is down and the Big Ten/ACC challenge is selected by last year&#039;s conference finish, so IU can&#039;t control whatever happens the following year.  However, IU has played two quality opponents (Xavier, So ILL) away from the HAll and Chattanooga gave Tennesee all that they can handle--score was 70-76. We beat them by 20. 

If you can remember a few years back when IU didn&#039;t make the tournament because of a really tough pre- Big Ten Conference schedule. I believe IU&#039;s schedule was ranked in the top 5. IU started out at 2-7 during that stretch and could never catch up and did not have any quality wins. IU ended up 15-14 and NIT bound. So, having a tough schedule can only help when you win games just ask Davidson. Finally, last year Ohio State had a pretty weak pre-conference schedule with the exception of two games-Florida and UNC. Ohio State dominated the conference and ended up in the championship. IU fans can look forward to the the rest of the season with a team that will have better chemistry and loads of confidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that IU has a weaker schedule this year, but, I heard Kelvin Sampson talk about how the schedule is made and he stated that the schedule is made in advance. UK is down and the Big Ten/ACC challenge is selected by last year&#8217;s conference finish, so IU can&#8217;t control whatever happens the following year.  However, IU has played two quality opponents (Xavier, So ILL) away from the HAll and Chattanooga gave Tennesee all that they can handle&#8211;score was 70-76. We beat them by 20. </p>
<p>If you can remember a few years back when IU didn&#8217;t make the tournament because of a really tough pre- Big Ten Conference schedule. I believe IU&#8217;s schedule was ranked in the top 5. IU started out at 2-7 during that stretch and could never catch up and did not have any quality wins. IU ended up 15-14 and NIT bound. So, having a tough schedule can only help when you win games just ask Davidson. Finally, last year Ohio State had a pretty weak pre-conference schedule with the exception of two games-Florida and UNC. Ohio State dominated the conference and ended up in the championship. IU fans can look forward to the the rest of the season with a team that will have better chemistry and loads of confidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 478/479 objects using apc

Served from: insidethehall.com @ 2012-02-10 01:16:02 -->
