<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Text messaging is dead; long live text messaging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/08/11/text-messaging-is-dead-long-live-text-messaging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/08/11/text-messaging-is-dead-long-live-text-messaging/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:00:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PostmanE</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/08/11/text-messaging-is-dead-long-live-text-messaging/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>PostmanE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 17:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/08/11/text-messaging-is-dead-long-live-text-messaging/#comment-388</guid>
		<description>Pieter: 

You&#039;re right, I&#039;m no mobile communications expert, nor did I attempt to be. I was merely pointing out where the major loophole for coaches is, and that&#039;s email. Whether SMS is obsolete among the general population is beside the point; all that matters is whether coaches will adapt to new technology, and as smartphone usage becomes more widespread, whether players will too. Then, all the bans on text messaging won&#039;t matter. 

My real point was just that the NCAA should be limiting contacts in general, regardless of format. Let&#039;s not get bogged down in semantics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pieter: </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, I&#8217;m no mobile communications expert, nor did I attempt to be. I was merely pointing out where the major loophole for coaches is, and that&#8217;s email. Whether SMS is obsolete among the general population is beside the point; all that matters is whether coaches will adapt to new technology, and as smartphone usage becomes more widespread, whether players will too. Then, all the bans on text messaging won&#8217;t matter. </p>
<p>My real point was just that the NCAA should be limiting contacts in general, regardless of format. Let&#8217;s not get bogged down in semantics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pieter de Villiers</title>
		<link>http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/08/11/text-messaging-is-dead-long-live-text-messaging/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Pieter de Villiers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidethehall.com/2007/08/11/text-messaging-is-dead-long-live-text-messaging/#comment-383</guid>
		<description>Hardly a headline with any relevance. Talking about the NCAA and relating that to the future of SMS as apposed to other messaging technologies hardly makes the commentator a subject matter expert. Text messaging is a long way form dead, fact: more SMS messages are being sent by individuals in more countries than any other communications medium (mobile IM, Mobile email, pagers, etc. combined). This is another silly claim with no facts to support it, we should be free to blog whatever we want to but one would expect that an article being published will have a bit more relevance and accuracy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hardly a headline with any relevance. Talking about the NCAA and relating that to the future of SMS as apposed to other messaging technologies hardly makes the commentator a subject matter expert. Text messaging is a long way form dead, fact: more SMS messages are being sent by individuals in more countries than any other communications medium (mobile IM, Mobile email, pagers, etc. combined). This is another silly claim with no facts to support it, we should be free to blog whatever we want to but one would expect that an article being published will have a bit more relevance and accuracy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
